On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > This is a common misconception of what IDENT is/was for. IDENT was not
> I know what the purpose of IDENT is. I wrote the original sendmail FAQ entry
> on this subject back in 1995.
Sorry, automatic response of the fingers, usually reserved for IRC
At 10:49 AM -0700 3/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Then there's the group who are running something like Windows ME who
> are adamant that "my time is too valuable for me to learn anything."
> What are we going to do, kick them off the list with a "learn-ya
> damn-ya!" I certainly feel that
At 9:48 AM -0500 3/9/07, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> This is a common misconception of what IDENT is/was for. IDENT was not
> intended to provide reliable authentication, as to who owned a connection.
I know what the purpose of IDENT is. I wrote the original sendmail
FAQ entry on this s
At 5:15 AM -0800 3/9/07, Herman Privyhum wrote:
> If disabling IDENT is so crucial, as both you and my
> experience with a triflingly small list seem to argue,
> it must be important to amend the Mailman-Exim Howto,
> no?
Well, it's their HowTo, so I don't see that this is something that we
