Re: [Mailman-Users] Using Mailman with Apache Tomcat

D G Teed wrote: > >If you are running Tomcat and no apache, then I'd say >don't bother. Get the plain apache and install it, >it will be up and running in minutes rather than days >to figure out how to make tomcat run plain old HTML >with a handful of CGIs. Use the right tool for the job. >Tomcat

Re: [Mailman-Users] Using Mailman with Apache Tomcat

Hi, If you are running Tomcat and no apache, then I'd say don't bother. Get the plain apache and install it, it will be up and running in minutes rather than days to figure out how to make tomcat run plain old HTML with a handful of CGIs. Use the right tool for the job. Tomcat is designed to run

Re: [Mailman-Users] Duplicate Emails - but only if first email has HTMLor stationary

Lisa Phillips wrote: > >Thank you for responding. I can provide the messages sent to the list, but >not the one as sent to the list. I am also going to see if the first one >caused some bounces from some of the members (they usually always do), and >I'll send that in a separate email. Please let

Re: [Mailman-Users] Counting messages that went to postfix queue

On 5/4/07, Mark Sapiro wrote: > This is really a question for Postfix resources. If Mailman says it > delivers to 577 recips, and you can only find 571 of them in Postfix's > logs, I think this has to be a Postfix issue. Or a problem with the tool you're using to look through the log files, o

Re: [Mailman-Users] Counting messages that went to postfix queue

On 5/4/07, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And it should, but it seems that it may not be in this case, BUT are > you sure Postfix dropped these addresses. Maybe you just didn't see > them in the logs because you were looking for the lower-cased address > and what was logged was the mi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Restoring missing messages due to wrong permissionsin mbox archive file

Ricardo Pereira wrote: > >I have corrected the permissions but now the messages sent during >that period weren't added to the list archives. How can I add the >missing messages to the archive? The messages should have been shunted and should be in the qfiles/shunt directory. If so, running

[Mailman-Users] Restoring missing messages due to wrong permissions in mbox archive file

Hi all, I've moved a list from one server to another a while ago but left the list archive .mbox file with the wrong permissions. After a week I noticed several permission denied errors in Mailman logs. I have corrected the permissions but now the messages sent during that period w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Counting messages that went to postfix queue

D G Teed wrote: > >I believe a pattern has emerged with the failure cases. > >I grep'ed for each of the 6 who failed in the output >from dumpdb for the list. > >~mailman/bin/dumpdb /var/lib/mailman/lists/mylist/config.pck | grep >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Each one of them had a mixed case letter in the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Counting messages that went to postfix queue

D G Teed wrote: > >Oh dear, that could be difficult to "prove" to Postfix peoples. >Is there a way to get more verbose logging of what mailman >is delivering other than what the mail server reports? >That way I could compare the two and see >which is dropping the ball. Yes, and no. Go to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Counting messages that went to postfix queue

On 5/4/07, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Instead of the above, do > > ~mailman/bin/list_members -r -n enabled mylistname | sort > /tmp/ott2 > > This will list only non-digest members with delivery enabled. > > Or perhaps this is not an issue. Is the number of lines in of /tmp/ott2 > eq

Re: [Mailman-Users] Counting messages that went to postfix queue

Hi, I believe a pattern has emerged with the failure cases. I grep'ed for each of the 6 who failed in the output from dumpdb for the list. ~mailman/bin/dumpdb /var/lib/mailman/lists/mylist/config.pck | grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] Each one of them had a mixed case letter in the username before the do

Re: [Mailman-Users] moderation bit off on explicitly selected users

Tomas Macek wrote: >we are using mailman 2.1.5 with Postfix. On our announce-only list we have >subscribed all of our employees. This list is fully moderated, so when someone >posts, the message waits for approving. That's fine. Now I need to have some >users (3 mail addresses) of the subscribe

Re: [Mailman-Users] Counting messages that went to postfix queue

D G Teed wrote: > >Another list, with 577 subscribers was sent out today. I validated >the email addresses, removed one before subscribing with >an underscore in the domain name. This time there are 6 addresses >which do not appear in /var/log/maillog (did a log rotate >just prior to the send to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Using Mailman with Apache Tomcat

--On May 4, 2007 10:42:03 AM -0500 Meenal Pant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a server running Liferay using apache tomcat. I access the portal > as: https://abc.xyz.org/web/guest/home > > Can I still install mailman and use it with apache as described in the > Mailman > Documentation.(http:/

[Mailman-Users] Using Mailman with Apache Tomcat

I have a server running Liferay using apache tomcat. I access the portal as: https://abc.xyz.org/web/guest/home Can I still install mailman and use it with apache as described in the Mailman Documentation.(http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-install/front.html) ? Basically I want to acces

Re: [Mailman-Users] Counting messages that went to postfix queue

Hello again, Another list, with 577 subscribers was sent out today. I validated the email addresses, removed one before subscribing with an underscore in the domain name. This time there are 6 addresses which do not appear in /var/log/maillog (did a log rotate just prior to the send to keep this

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

--- Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Your site use Mailman-2.1.5 which is way too old. > Upgrade to the > current version (2.1.9) and try again. > > -- > Tokio Kikuchi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/ > ok that was it. Mailman 2.1.9 solves this problem. My

[Mailman-Users] moderation bit off on explicitly selected users

Hi, we are using mailman 2.1.5 with Postfix. On our announce-only list we have subscribed all of our employees. This list is fully moderated, so when someone posts, the message waits for approving. That's fine. Now I need to have some users (3 mail addresses) of the subscribes, that can post to