Re: [Mailman-Users] multiple header_filter_rules?

2007-06-03 Thread David R Bosso
--On Friday, June 1, 2007 11:32 AM -0700 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David R Bosso wrote: --On May 22, 2007 4:53:05 PM -0700 Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David R Bosso wrote: I have 2 rules set up. For a given test message, Rule 1 does not match, and Rule 2 does. If I

Re: [Mailman-Users] multiple header_filter_rules?

2007-06-03 Thread Mark Sapiro
David R Bosso wrote: Rule 1 is (I thought) Match Return-Path:, only if it's not followed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] This should discard for any Return Path but my email address, did you modify it to match yours, or do I have the (?!...) syntax wrong? My mistake. I didn't really look at the Rule 1

[Mailman-Users] Edit to FAQ 3.11 How do I create a newsletter/announcement/one-way list?

2007-06-03 Thread John Bell
In FAQ 3.11 it mentions how to do the following: Features: Members join by filling in a form on your website (and replying to the confirmation email). They will be sent a welcome message that does not mention how to post to the list. They will receive your newsletters, with a footer that gives

Re: [Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: Server not connected

2007-06-03 Thread Brad Knowles
On 6/4/07, Leonard Jacobs wrote: Yes, I have stopped restarted Mailman after each mm_cfg.py change and no, there are no anti-virus or other rejections with postfix. Additionally I am not running SELinux on this box. I haven't checked the earlier messages in this thread -- I'm assuming

Re: [Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: Server not connected

2007-06-03 Thread Leonard Jacobs
ubject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: Server not connected From: Leonard Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:31:01 -0400 To: mailman-users@python.org To: mailman-users@python.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0

Re: [Mailman-Users] Low level smtp error: Server not connected

2007-06-03 Thread Brad Knowles
On 6/4/07, Leonard Jacobs wrote: Yes, I have tried all the suggestions provided earlier in FAQ 4.73 6.14. Could you also trim your replies? Including several levels of additional material from previous replies makes it very difficult to tell who has said what, and where the new text is.