On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:31:27 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >> Why are there 121
> >> messages being retried. What is in Mailman's smtp-failure log?
> >
> > It is full of errors:
> >
> >Jan 08 01:55:00 2008 (13316) All recipients refused: {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]':
> >(450, '4.1.2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Re
Grigory Batalov wrote:
>
>On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:59:10 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>
>> Why are there 121
>> messages being retried. What is in Mailman's smtp-failure log?
>
> It is full of errors:
>
>Jan 08 01:55:00 2008 (13316) All recipients refused: {'[EMAIL PROTECTED]':
>(450, '4.1.2 <[EMAIL
Dennis Putnam wrote:
>
>I just discovered something that may or may not be useful. Just for
>grins I tried sending a request to the request mail box. I saw some
>errors in the syslog but the main one is that there is a group error.
>The mailman wrapper expected to be run as group 'mail' but ran as
Dennis Putnam wrote:
>
>At 07:10 PM 1/7/2008, you wrote:
>
>What does Mailman's bin/list_lists show?
>
>It shows my lists correctly.
I am confused.
Your original post said "Well, mailman works but it does not recognize
any of my old lists. How do I get Mailman to see the lists again?"
Now you s
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 03:41:23 +0300, Grigory Batalov wrote:
> > What does Mailman's smtp log look like? Does it show evidence of
> > 'continuous processing'?
>
> Well, there are messages like this:
>
> Jan 08 01:55:11 2008 (12250) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> smtp to sisyphus for 1
> recips, completed i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just discovered something that may or may not be useful. Just for
grins I tried sending a request to the request mail box. I saw some
errors in the syslog but the main one is that there is a group error.
The mailman wrapper expected to be run as grou
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:59:10 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> >I have regular delays in message processing. Say, my server (Linux/Postfix)
> >receives a letter at 17:36 and quickly delivers it to the mailman queue (?).
> >Then message is hold for about 25 minutes and is processed again at 18:01.
> >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks again. Please see the embedded responses.
At 07:10 PM 1/7/2008, you wrote:
What does Mailman's bin/list_lists show?
It shows my lists correctly.
What exactly is in mm_cfg.py and Defaults.py for VAR_PREFIX and
LIST_DATA_DIR. Note that if LIS
On 1/7/08, Dennis Putnam wrote:
> I knew it wasn't going to be that easy. Everything you mentioned seems
> copacetic. I guess the next question is, can I set some kind of debug
> that will give me some useful information in the logs?
There is no "debug mode" with Mailman. What you get in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 02:32 PM 1/5/2008, you wrote:
Look in Defaults.py for things like PREFIX, EXEC_PREFIX and
VAR_PREFIX,
and then for things defined in terms of these such as LIST_DATA_DIR,
LOG_DIR, etc.
Then look in mm_cfg.py for possible overrides.
- --
Mark Sapi
Charles Marcus wrote:
>I'm trying to be patient, but NO ONE has a clue or idea where I might
>look to solve this?
As Brad says, we don't.
Here is an example of the init.d/mailman script that we distribute
after 'configure'.
-
This might be of interest to the Mailman User Community.
Our team has recently released SELS v0.4 software.
http://sels.ncsa.uiuc.edu/
This software release has two parts. One for the List Server (LS), which
enables a list administrator to set up a Secure List Server using
Mailman and GnuPG. The
On 1/7/08, Charles Marcus wrote:
> I'm trying to be patient, but NO ONE has a clue or idea where I might
> look to solve this?
>
> I've asked here because I'm getting deafening silence on the Gentoo
> forums too...
Everything I've seen on this subject leads me to believe that the
problems yo
I'm trying to be patient, but NO ONE has a clue or idea where I might
look to solve this?
I've asked here because I'm getting deafening silence on the Gentoo
forums too...
:(
Charles Marcus, on 1/6/2008 1:15 PM, said the following:
> Anyone? This is actually now a little worse - I updated the
Brad Knowles wrote:
On 1/7/08, Troy Knabe wrote:
I want to set a list so that users cannot self subscribe. Is there a
way to do that? I only see "confirm, require approval, or confirm and
approve". I would like "not allowed"
What's wrong with requiring approval, and then just
On 1/7/08, Troy Knabe wrote:
> I want to set a list so that users cannot self subscribe. Is there a
> way to do that? I only see "confirm, require approval, or confirm and
> approve". I would like "not allowed"
What's wrong with requiring approval, and then just not approving any requests?
Troy Knabe wrote:
>> I want to set a list so that users cannot self subscribe. Is there a
>> way to do that? I only see "confirm, require approval, or confirm and
>> approve". I would like "not allowed"
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Troy
And charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied:
> Looks like ban_l
Troy Knabe wrote:
>Ok so that brings up 2 questions for me.
>
>1. What would I put to ban everyone from being able to subscribe?
^.
Ie, a pattern that matches any address with at least one character.
>2. If I banned everyone from subscription then I wouldn't be able to
>add them manually e
Looks like ban_list under Privacy Options will do what you desire.
~c
Troy Knabe wrote:
> I want to set a list so that users cannot self subscribe. Is there a
> way to do that? I only see "confirm, require approval, or confirm and
> approve". I would like "not allowed"
>
> Than
Ok so that brings up 2 questions for me.
1. What would I put to ban everyone from being able to subscribe?
2. If I banned everyone from subscription then I wouldn't be able to
add them manually either, or is that not a correct assumption?
Thanks
-Troy
On Jan 7, 2008, at 9:27 AM, charlie de
I want to set a list so that users cannot self subscribe. Is there a
way to do that? I only see "confirm, require approval, or confirm and
approve". I would like "not allowed"
Thanks
-Troy
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@pyth
Grigory Batalov wrote:
>
>I have regular delays in message processing. Say, my server (Linux/Postfix)
>receives a letter at 17:36 and quickly delivers it to the mailman queue (?).
>Then message is hold for about 25 minutes and is processed again at 18:01.
>
>It is strange to me, why mailman keeps t
Hello!
I have regular delays in message processing. Say, my server (Linux/Postfix)
receives a letter at 17:36 and quickly delivers it to the mailman queue (?).
Then message is hold for about 25 minutes and is processed again at 18:01.
It is strange to me, why mailman keeps the message so long?
Ho
23 matches
Mail list logo
