Thanks for the explanation, Mark. I've never used anything but plain
text digests, so I didn't know there was a way to get attachments that
way.
On 8 Aug 08, at 20:18, Mark Sapiro wrote:
All the attachments that were included in the individual messages sent
to a list (i.e. not removed by co
Jan Steinman wrote:
>> From: Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> James - Dunn Deal PR wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Does MailMan support attachments? I read that it does, but I
>>> want to
>>> be sure. MM is no good to me if it doesn't.
>>
>> Mailman has optional content filtering. If you turn it off, Mai
From: Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
James - Dunn Deal PR wrote:
1. Does MailMan support attachments? I read that it does, but I
want to
be sure. MM is no good to me if it doesn’t.
Mailman has optional content filtering. If you turn it off, Mailman
will pass the message to the list with al
James - Dunn Deal PR wrote:
>1. Does MailMan support attachments? I read that it does, but I want to
>be sure. MM is no good to me if it doesnt.
Mailman has optional content filtering. If you turn it off, Mailman
will pass the message to the list with all attachment's intact, or you
can set
Hey all. I run a publicity company, and we regularly email mp3s to our email
list of a couple thousand DJs. I have MailMan on my Plesk server interface,
and Im wondering if MM can help make that process easier for me. A few
questions.
1. Does MailMan support attachments? I read t
Knabe, Troy wrote:
>So that works, but I am still seeing 7 minutes where the messages are staying
>in the sendmail queue. Sendmail is configured to re-run the queue every 5
>minutes so the extra 2 is about right for how long it takes to go through the
>other messages in the queue first. But wh
Knabe, Troy wrote:
So that works, but I am still seeing 7 minutes where the messages are
staying in the sendmail queue. Sendmail is configured to re-run the
queue every 5 minutes so the extra 2 is about right for how long it
takes to go through the other messages in the queue first. But why
does
So that works, but I am still seeing 7 minutes where the messages are staying
in the sendmail queue. Sendmail is configured to re-run the queue every 5
minutes so the extra 2 is about right for how long it takes to go through the
other messages in the queue first. But why does the message hit t
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
If for piddling legal or other constraints such as not finding a pillory
in working order prevent you from using that approach, I tend to set "no
mail" for those uses, and if there is reason to believe that it is a
site wide problem, I may bar users from that site, or a
On Aug 8, 2008, at 10:01 AM, Webmaster PF wrote:
1. How to filter out “Out of Office” replies to the list.
I have found that putting the first few users who use broken
autoresponders into a pillory has some deterrent effect, but memories
need to be refreshed occasionally.
If for pid
Knabe, Troy wrote:
So my sendmail start script included /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -q5m
So I made it /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \
-ODaemonPortOptions=Name=MSA,Port=1313,M=E,Addr=127.0.0.1
End original message. -
Put the original line ba
So my sendmail start script included /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -q5m
So I made it /usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \
-ODaemonPortOptions=Name=MSA,Port=1313,M=E,Addr=127.0.0.1
On 8/8/08 12:04 PM, "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Knabe, Troy wrote:
>
>You can do this withou
Knabe, Troy wrote:
>
>You can do this without modifying your sendmail files at all. Instead, in your
>startup script, add:
>
>/usr/sbin/sendmail -bd -ODeliveryMode=defer \
>-ODaemonPortOptions=Name=MSA,Port=,M=E,Addr=127.0.0.1
Did you ADD that, or replace something wi
I am quite certain that this is the answer to my issue, as I see the Mailman
messages being routed through my spam filter 2x as it enters/leaves queues.
But when I tried to impliment it sendmail quit listening on port 25. Anyone
else experience issues with this solution? Any suggestions? Tha
Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
> > 2. Is there a way to prevent duplicate postings when people cross post?
>
> No. This cannot be done reliably
I'll stand by that if you want 100.00% exclusion, but Mark's
suggestion of regular_exclude_lists should work 99% of the time, for
most Mailman sites w
Hank van Cleef wrote:
Just because:
Solaris isn't Linux, and sendmail isn't Postfix, isn't a reason to
call either one of them "screwed up."
You picked a really bad analogy to make with me.
I've been administering Suns for almost twenty years, since the SunOS 4.0.2
days. I still vividly re
Thanks Mark, just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing something somewhere.
Keith
On 7 Aug 2008 at 13:44, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Keith Risinger wrote:
> >
> >Is there some way an owner can get a listing of all they lists they are
> >owners of? I've not found anything in the admin pages. As the si
Webmaster PF writes:
> 1. How to filter out Out of Office replies to the list.
This is almost impossible to do genericly, because the presence of an
autoreply to the list indicates that that member is using stupid
software (it's very easy to detect a standard mailing list post
because it conta
Webmaster PF wrote:
>
>1. How to filter out "Out of Office" replies to the list.
There is no good way. You might be able to use Privacy options... ->
Spam filters -> header_filter_rules for this if you can figure out a
regexp to match against headers to identify them.
Otherwise, you need a c
The esteemed Brad Knowles has said:
>
> On 8/7/08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
> > After some off list back and forth, Alan determined that the problem was
> > that the mailman user had /bin/false as a login shell. Once that was
> > changed, the script worked as expected.
>
> Was this on a Solaris b
I have not been able to locate a reference for this in the FAQ so I would
appreciate if someone can point it out for me. Thanks.
1. How to filter out “Out of Office” replies to the list.
2. Is there a way to prevent duplicate postings when people cross post?
-Shaf
No virus foun
Brad Knowles wrote:
>On 8/7/08, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> After some off list back and forth, Alan determined that the problem was
>> that the mailman user had /bin/false as a login shell. Once that was
>> changed, the script worked as expected.
>
>Was this on a Solaris box? I've had problems wi
22 matches
Mail list logo
