Hello,
Mark Sapiro:
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
What something like that work or do I need to learn python? :)
output.append('META http-equiv=Content-Type '
'content=text/html; charset=%s' % charset)
output.append('META http-equiv=Content-Type '
Hi,
Is there a way to set the default new_member_option to no mail?
Apparently you can't from the GUI, but is there a way to do this in
mm_cfg.py or somewhere else?
Thanks...
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
CK pisze:
Hi Sbigniew,
I got your email from the list.
Can I ask you a question concerning this alert I got on my website ?
I am afraid it is a little bit stupid.
I can not access my administration page. When I try to log in, it say :
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.5
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
Probably something obvious I'm missing...
Oh - I'm on mailman 2.1.11 for this and the other question I had about
setting the default new_member_options to no mail for a list...
I can change the admin_member_chunksize on the General Options page, but
setting it to anything larger than 29 doesn't
Hello. I've had a long running Mailman installation with about a dozen lists
spread over four domain names on a Dell PowerEdge with 3GB RAM running CentOS
3.9 (fully patched). We're using the non-default Sendmail 8.14.1. I've upgraded
to 2.1.11 in June and everything was working fine/clean until
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Thanks! I ran into another problem. I modified the general list
information page for one of the lists.
I edited it from the command line to include a style sheet in it (to
test before I do it site-wide). This cannot be done via GUI. Anyway, as
long as the link to a
On 8/18/2008 10:53 AM, Simon wrote:
Probably something obvious I'm missing...
Oh - I'm on mailman 2.1.11 for this and the other question I had about
setting the default new_member_options to no mail for a list...
I can change the admin_member_chunksize on the General Options page, but
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
CK pisze:
I can not access my administration page. When I try to log in, it say :
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.5
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of
traceback and other system information has been
Mark Sapiro pisze:
First of all, if you think you're saving anything by including a
relative or absolute path as the href= value of the stylesheet link as
opposed to a URL, you are not.
If you have for example in your template that becomes
http://www.example.com/mailman/listinfo/list, something
Gary Goldberg wrote:
Hello. I've had a long running Mailman installation with about a dozen lists
spread over four domain names on a Dell PowerEdge with 3GB RAM running CentOS
3.9 (fully patched). We're using the non-default Sendmail 8.14.1. I've upgraded
to 2.1.11 in June and everything was
Simon wrote:
Is there a way to set the default new_member_option to no mail?
Apparently you can't from the GUI, but is there a way to do this in
mm_cfg.py or somewhere else?
You'd have to modify the code to do this.
--
Mark Sapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]The highway is for gamblers,
San
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
All this is true and I well realize that. The example with css is
simple. No problem. I actually have a problem with a javascript file
that the layoput designer has used. I am suspecting it won't display
because I have to use a complete URL instead of a relative one as
Mark Sapiro pisze:
OTOH, a reference to some/javascript is not going to work because
http://www.example.com/mailman/listinfo/some/javascript is not
going to serve the javascript; it's going to attempt to serve the
listinfo page for the list named some.
Thank you Mark - do I read it correctly
Thank you for the reply. I do regularly use yum to apply CentOS patches to the
server, and that could be a source, although after looking at the yum.log, I
couldn't say
which patch might be a source of the problem. Here's the yum log back to the
prior
reboot though...
Mar 23 13:07:44 Updated:
My apologies, I forgot to include the dumpdb of the latest message. Here it is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] shunt]# /home/digimark/www-mailman/bin/dumpdb
1219082263.843436+005585610ba4a159240f8195f7cc2a955b5c7670.pck
[- start pickle file -]
- start object 1 -
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon
On 8/18/2008 1:35 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Is there a way to set the default new_member_option to no mail?
Apparently you can't from the GUI, but is there a way to do this in
mm_cfg.py or somewhere else?
You'd have to modify the code to do this.
Ok, well, since ianap, I guess I'll just have to
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Mark Sapiro pisze:
OTOH, a reference to some/javascript is not going to work because
http://www.example.com/mailman/listinfo/some/javascript is not
going to serve the javascript; it's going to attempt to serve the
listinfo page for the list named some.
Thank you Mark
Gary Goldberg wrote:
My apologies, I forgot to include the dumpdb of the latest message. Here it is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] shunt]# /home/digimark/www-mailman/bin/dumpdb
1219082263.843436+005585610ba4a159240f8195f7cc2a955b5c7670.pck
[- start pickle file -]
snip
- start object 2 -
{
Gary Goldberg wrote:
Thank you for the reply. I do regularly use yum to apply CentOS patches to the
server, and that could be a source, although after looking at the yum.log, I
couldn't say
which patch might be a source of the problem. Here's the yum log back to the
prior
reboot though...
snip
It appears to be affecting all the lists, although they are of such low volume,
that nothing else has been posted since.
I will install the latest version of python and report back, although I
understood from the download/requirements page that python 2.1.x and 2.2.x
would work. But looking at
Gary Goldberg wrote:
It appears to be affecting all the lists, although they are of such low volume,
that nothing else has been posted since.
I will install the latest version of python and report back, although I
understood from the download/requirements page that python 2.1.x and 2.2.x
would
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Mark Sapiro wrote:
This error is really strange. Did you by any chance not stop Mailman
before doing the re-install and start it fresh after?
I uninstalled the distribution python package and installed python 2.5.2 from
the binary distro. No apparent change, but then I
Hello,
We have an internal Mailman server. The service is up and running for our
internal clients, but now we need to have it accessible to the world. We have a
reverse-proxy that will allow us to redirect to port 80 for our internal Mailman
server, but our Security group seems to have a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have an internal Mailman server. The service is up and running for our
internal clients, but now we need to have it accessible to the world. We have
a
reverse-proxy that will allow us to redirect to port 80 for our internal
Mailman
server, but our Security group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Mark. That seems to be working. We don't currently support virtual
hosts and their lists. If we did, is there another simple way to make
www.lists
appear the same as just lists?
No. And you'll probably have problems anyway with what you have.
Each list has
Hello everybody,
I'm stuck with a problem. I've installed mailman and postfix via apt (debian
4.0).
If I register a user or a bounce message is sent to the list owner, the
emails go through and are received by the recipient. But if any user sends
an email to the list, it will be archieved but not
--
Jon
--
Jon
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
27 matches
Mail list logo
