Hey Mailman Users,
I have a strange issue affecting a client's mailing list. It seems the
mailman server is repeatedly removing an e-mail address due to excessive
bounces. I see this in the subscribe log file:
Mar 22 20:38:04 2009 (26386) listname_list.domain.com: deleted
em...@verizon.net; disab
Mailman 2.1.10 on OpenBSD 4.4 with Postfix 2.5.3
Checked the FAQ and searched Google but didn't see anything that
directly addressed this:
Most messages make it into the archives but a few do not. I've pasted
below a sample of a message that didn't make it to the archive. I
suspect that it might
Brian Carpenter wrote:
>
>I have a strange issue affecting a client's mailing list. It seems the
>mailman server is repeatedly removing an e-mail address due to excessive
>bounces. I see this in the subscribe log file:
>
>Mar 22 20:38:04 2009 (26386) listname_list.domain.com: deleted
>em...@verizon
David Newman wrote:
>
>Most messages make it into the archives but a few do not. I've pasted
>below a sample of a message that didn't make it to the archive. I
>suspect that it might be related to Postfix's message handling but am
>not sure what's missing from the offending messages.
The message
Nyrobi Collins wrote:
>We are having an issue with subscribers receiving three of the same emails
>every time I send an email. It doesn't happen to every subscriber, but
>those who get multiples always get three.
>
>Any suggestions for how to eliminate this?
Unless the affected people are actu
> all, his bounce proccessing is too strict. He has
> bounce_score_threshold <= 1 and bounce_you_are_disabled_warnings = 0
> so the member is removed on the first bounce.
Thanks for the reply Mark. I checked the bounce settings and the
bounce_score_threshold is set to 5 and bounce warnings set to
On 3/26/09 8:05 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> David Newman wrote:
>> Most messages make it into the archives but a few do not. I've pasted
>> below a sample of a message that didn't make it to the archive. I
>> suspect that it might be related to Postfix's message handling but am
>> not sure what's miss
David Newman wrote:
>
>Here's another message that actually was cc:'d to a list but didn't make
>it into the archives. This subscriber is a frequent poster and other
>messages of his exist in the archives.
>
>It's HTML mail but then so is all this subscriber's other mail.
>
>Thanks again for any cl
On 3/26/09 2:49 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> There are only a few reasons why a
> particular post would not be archived, assuming archiving is working
> in general.
Archiving is working in general.
>
> 1) There could be something in this particular post that throws an
> exception in ArchRunner. Thi
