On May 19, 2012, at 4:13 AM, Anne Wainwright wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying that, Brad, I wasn't sure what the import of
> Mark's messsage was.
>
> Why would this not be set to 'list' rather than 'bulk'?
According to RFC 2076, the "Precedence:" header is "Non-standard,
controversial, discourage
On 5/19/2012 2:13 AM, Anne Wainwright wrote:
>
> Why would this not be set to 'list' rather than 'bulk'?
List posts are sent with Precedence: list. Notices from Mailman, e.g.
held message notices to an admin, invitations and welcome messages to
users, password reminders, etc. are all sent with P
<< On 5/14/2012 8:54 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
So my mailing lists are getting hit by spam that goes to the lists
since it claims to be from some poor subscriber whose email got
hijacked. >>
Mark, it's nowhere near as bad as the same type/subject Yahoo
Lists ! ! !
But to be more general, wha
<...>
<< On 5/19/2012 10:46 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
I will point out that from the recipients point of view, a mailman
invite looks to be "Bulk", they have no way to know if you sent it
specifically to them or to a large list.
<...>
One way around this is rather than us the mailman invite fea
On 5/18/12 6:14 PM, Anne Wainwright wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the record the following URL is of interest
>
> http://www.spamhaus.org/consumer/definition/
>
> This clearly makes the point that spam is defined by two factors
>
> "A message is Spam only if it is both Unsolicited and Bulk"
>
> and being wh
Hi,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 09:33:03PM -0500, Brad Knowles wrote:
> On May 18, 2012, at 5:14 PM, Anne Wainwright wrote:
>
> > For the record the following URL is of interest
> >
> > http://www.spamhaus.org/consumer/definition/
> >
> > This clearly makes the point that spam is defined by two fac
Anne Wainwright writes:
> I have sinned and stand repentant. I hate spam as much as anyone and we
> get plenty to deal with. Somehow the Viagra and get rich emails didn't
> seem to stand on the same level as a once-off invite.
They don't, from the point of view of the sender or society at larg
Anne Wainwright writes:
> This clearly makes the point that spam is defined by two factors
>
> "A message is Spam only if it is both Unsolicited and Bulk"
That's true, but as far as I can remember definitions of UCE
(unsolicited commercial email) have no such restriction to bulk.
---
