On 11/20/2013 07:57 AM, Christopher Adams wrote:
>
> So, any idea of what might of happened to gum it up. Thanks for taking
> the time to address this issue. It seemingly has corrected itself.
It appears that BounceRunner had died for some reason. To understand
more, I'd need to see the full Mai
Lindsay Haisley writes:
> On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 14:01 +0100, Roel Wagenaar wrote:
> > And maybe you could stop TOP-posting?
That's a bit quick on the trigger. I don't recall ever seeing a
top-post from "Tanstaafl" before, for one thing, and that moniker has
been around for as long as I can reme
On 2013-11-20 10:08 AM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 14:01 +0100, Roel Wagenaar wrote:
And maybe you could stop TOP-posting?
In my humble opinion, any post that's less that a visual page in length
is more conveniently read if it's top-posted, especially if it is in
reference t
Mark,
I had restarted Mailman several times and still, bounce processing was not
taking place and the bounce log had not been written since 11/13. Before I
left last night, I restarted it and then I noticed a flurry of activity,
with queued bounces being processed. I hadn't looked in the
/qfiles/b
Steven Clift writes:
> Thanks Stephen.
>
> Are most mailman hosts finding their mail in Gmail heading to the
> "Promotions" tab or "Forums" optional tab?
I don't receive any Mailman mail at my Gmail address, so I can't say.
But hold that thought ... if you don't get any response, I'll ping
so
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 14:01 +0100, Roel Wagenaar wrote:
> And maybe you could stop TOP-posting?
>
In my humble opinion, any post that's less that a visual page in length
is more conveniently read if it's top-posted, especially if it is in
reference to a much longer quoted post. I know it's consid
Tanstaafl wrote:
> (Sorry for replying to an older thread, I'm going back through older unread
> mails)
>
> Maybe these should be made an official part of mailman's extra tools?
>
> And maybe updated to work with MM3?
>
And maybe you could stop TOP-posting?
--
Roel Wagenaar,
Linux-User #46
(Sorry for replying to an older thread, I'm going back through older
unread mails)
Maybe these should be made an official part of mailman's extra tools?
And maybe updated to work with MM3?
On 2013-11-05 2:46 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 13:14 -0600, c cc wrote:
Mark,
It
