[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Carl Zwanzig
For clarity- As I understand, given the language differences MM3 was a complete rewrite of MM2, so the only common parts are some features, the use of python (at all), and the name. Yes? Therefore anyone working on MM2 isn't impeding the work on MM3, especially if they weren't going to work on M

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Chip Davis
OK guys, what's really going on here? Stephen and Mark, you are both thoughtful writers and crucial members of the Mailman team.  Jim, you have made a generous offer that seems to have the support of the Mailman 2 user community, at least. Is this about turf?  Is there something about Jim's p

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 03:53 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes: > > > Again with the "Jim's team". Those other guys, that other group, them > > folks That's nauseating to hear from you Stephen. > > I use the word "team" to describe people who work t

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes: > Again with the "Jim's team". Those other guys, that other group, them > folks That's nauseating to hear from you Stephen. I use the word "team" to describe people who work together closely to achieve common goals. That's just English. The team I

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Jonathan M
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 2:37 PM Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > A couple of days ago, over on the MAILOP mailinglist, there was a long > thread titled 'Mailman confirmation email denial of service'. This > detailed some of the problems we've all seen with Mailman subscrip

[Mailman-Users] Re: mailman v2.x

2020-08-28 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2020-08-26 21:28:30 (+0800), Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: So, I have volunteered to spearhead an effort to add one or two more people to the Mailman Coders group[2] in order to vet and approve new features that continue the long tradition of providing value to Mailman 2.x. Who's w