On 6/18/20 10:42 AM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
I do see that Mnogosearch hasn't been updates since 2015, is that the
best choice of tool?
Gosh! For autox.team.net/archive I'm using MHonArc and Namazu. Compared
to these, Mnogosearch seems cutting edge!
And yes, I am considering newer, better
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
On 4/27/19 10:56 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 4/27/19 5:25 PM, Mark J Bradakis via Mailman-Users wrote:
And if you post one of those tracebacks here, we'd be happy to help
No need to, the fix was easy. I had changed some permissions and
ownership of the mailman cgi files while trying to figure
Progress! Well, I guess, at least a differnet error. Changed some
Apache configs regarding cgi and now when I go to
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo
I get
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.29
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem.
On 4/24/19 4:27 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
Yes, selinux.
[root@autox teamnet]# getenforce
Disabled
Selinux should not be a factor here.
mjb.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
On 4/24/19 3:01 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I'm still interested in 'ls -l'
[root@autox cgi-bin]# ls -l
total 352
-rwxr-sr-x. 1 mailman mailman 31496 Apr 20 09:36 admin
-rwxr-sr-x. 1 mailman mailman 31496 Apr 20 09:36 admindb
-rwxr-sr-x. 1 mailman mailman 31496 Apr 20 09:36 confirm
-rwxr-sr-x. 1
[root@autox cgi-bin]# ls -Z .
system_u:object_r:default_t:s0 admin system_u:object_r:default_t:s0 options
system_u:object_r:default_t:s0 admindb system_u:object_r:default_t:s0
private
system_u:object_r:default_t:s0 confirm system_u:object_r:default_t:s0 rmlist
system_u:object_r:default_t:s0
So digging through the logs I found this:
[authz_core:error] [pid 31549:tid 139863772874496] [client
50.198.190.18:46884] AH01630: client denied by server configuration:
So I added an AuthType None to the httpd.conf file. Now I still get the
Server unavailable page, but a different err:
On 4/23/19 1:07 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
The above URL returns:
Service Unavailable
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to
maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later.
Have you run Mailman's bin/check_perms? I suspect some kind of
permissions
So a couple of days ago I had a server just up and die. It was put in
place about 12 years ago, if not more. Luckily I was working on
replacing it, so I had a new box under construction almost ready to
take its place. But the old server dies before I could make a smooth
transition and get
Thanks for the responses, I have it doing what I want it to do now.
mjb.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy:
I have a feeling I may have asked this question a few years ago. Maybe not.
When you go to the admin web page of pending moderator requests, the
messages are presented in a list using alphabetical order of the
sender. Is there a way to easily change this so they are presented by
date, oldest
Mailman is not working. Messages come in, nothing goes out. Logs are
useless, providing no clue as to what is happening.
In a working mailman system. what is the sequence of logging that a
message would go through?
mjb.
--
Mailman-Users
Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 08/16/2014 08:34 PM, Mark J Bradakis wrote:
Indeed. I can go to the listinfo page, click on the archives for the bad
lists, browse the archives, no problem.
And after doing this is the list's data_version still 98? If so, I suspect some
permissions issue or something
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Can you go to the admin page for the list? If so, does the from_is_list setting
appear there?
Sort of. I get the login page for the list just fine, type in the password then
get the 'hit a bug' page.
Error log shows:
admin(2802): File
S I finally decide to sit down and try to figure out why
http://www.team.net/mailman/admin
and http://autox.team.net/mailman/admin return different results, even though
it is the same machine.
Checking on some list configs, I do bin/config_list -o - listname and get
this from one list,
but
As an added bit of info, the first 7 of 67 lists, in alphabetical order all
have this
problem. Maybe I just need to reinstall 2.1.18-1
mjb.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
There is an issue with the list's data_version attribute vs.
Mailman.Version.DATA_FILE_VERSION. When the from_is_list and other new
attributes were added, Mailman.Version.DATA_FILE_VERSION was incremented to
make it greater than the list's data_version attribute which in turn will cause
Mark Sapiro wrote:
I understood that config_list wouldn't work. That's why I suggested that you
need first to fix the lists by changing DATA_FILE_VERSION in Mailman/Version.py
and then instantiating the lists to fix them.
I guess I am not understanding what you mean by instantiating
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Anything you do which accesses a list's config.pck via Mailman/MailList.py
(which is pretty much any Mailman process other than bin/dumpdb) will test if
Mailman.Version.DATA_FILE_VERSION is greater than the list's data_version and
if so, will run
Currently just over 8,000 queued messages awaiting delivery. But I don't think
it is a mailman issue:
root@autox:~# ping -c 3 gmail.com
PING gmail.com (74.125.225.182) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from den03s05-in-f22.1e100.net (74.125.225.182): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55
time=20.2 ms
64 bytes from
Just installed a fresh copy of 2.1.18-1. Sent a test message to a list where
dmarc_moderation_action
is set to 'munge from'. The message resulted in this error log entry:
May 13 23:16:25 2014 (26946) Uncaught runner exception: unsupported operand
type(s) for ^=: 'int' and 'str'
May 13
Mark Sapiro wrote:
What's in Mailman's qrunner log?
Nothing.
There can't be Nothing in the qrunner log unless you never started
mailmnanctl or you're looking at the wrong log?
My turn to apologize, I should have specified that the logs contained nothing
related to
that specific
Moving Mailman from an old Fedora system to a new Ubuntu ( 13.10 )
server. going to the mailman/listinfo or admin links results in
the web pages asking if I want to download the binary file.
Actually I want the file to be executed on the server, and give me the
expected pages. Time for a
You'd think that these lines in the config file would work like they
used to, but apparently not:
ScriptAlias /mailman/ /local/mailman/teamnet/cgi-bin/
Directory /local/mailman/teamnet/cgi-bin
Options +ExecCGI
SetHandler cgi-script
Require all granted
And it gets stranger:
www.team.net:80 50.198.190.18 - - [20/Jan/2014:18:50:15 -0700] GET
/mailman/admin HTTP/1.1 200 27444 - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23
www.team.net:80 50.198.190.18 - - [20/Jan/2014:18:59:38 -0700] GET
Mark Sapiro wrote:
is not effective for these URLs. Why is an Apache question, not a
Mailman question,
Yes, it is an apache issue.
And boy, do I feel silly. I like to cook. I don't think I ever stood
there waiting for a pot of water to boil without putting water in the
pot first.
mjb.
Javad Hoseini-Nopendar wrote:
Hello
I have a mailing list. In the settings of the mailing list, I selected No for
Sending monthly password reminder, but the mailing list still sends membership
reminders to the members in the beginning of each month. What should I do to deactivate sending
that
Is there any method to identify the user from the AOL feedback loop? If
not, how does AOL expect us to unsubscribe the user who complained?
I set personalization to yes and have something like the following in
the non-digest
footers:
Unsubscribe:
So my mailing lists are getting hit by spam that goes to the lists
since it claims to be from some poor subscriber whose email got
hijacked. But to be more general, what are some of the current
best practices to filter out spam in a postfix mailman environment
on Linux?
mjb.
So I go to the mailman/admin webpage, and get a the 'we hit a bug' page.
The error log shows:
admin(3764): [- Mailman Version: 2.1.14 -]
admin(3764): [- Traceback --]
admin(3764): Traceback (most recent call last):
admin(3764): File /local/mailman/teamnet/scripts/driver, line
I've been running various automotive related mailing lists,
web pages, FTP sites and such for over twenty years. It is
a labor of love, not a means of making money, so tending to
outstanding requests is not top priority. But I've had a
nasty cold the last few days, and have spent some time
A current thread reminded me of the trouble I was having with
Mailman taking 2 - 3 hours to process messages and send them
out. I requested the list's help in tracking down the problem.
Turned out to be a hardware issue. Some bad disk blocks
showed up in the qfiles tree so some qrunner
Can anyone tell me at what point in the process of delivering
list messages does information get written to logs/post and
logs/smtp ?
Currently a message comes in, postfix hands it off to
mailman and the message is written to the qfiles/out
directory within a second or so.
But it isn't until
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Precisely what does a web forum do? Would Trac or Roundup serve?
Are you seriously asking about what are web forums? There's about 38.63
gazillion of them on the net. A couple I'm working on are at
http://www.team.net/forums
and
http://wasatchfoodies.com
Have you tried VERP?
I'd rather not turn on VERP for all 60+ lists I'm running. As I recall
it is a domain wide setting, not a per list setting.
I was hoping there might be a way to use something like $(user_address)
in non-digest mode on digest mailings for just the one list with the
Speaking of brain dead AOL cretins, is there any way to get some sort of
personalization in digests that are sent out? I've got a few lists
where some
clueless AOL dimwit getting digests is marking the mail as abuse.
I would love to simply remove them from the list, but thanks to the
policies
So all of a sudden my mailman ( version 2.1.9 ) quit working, returning
mail posted to lists with the error
|/local/mailman/teamnet/mail/mailman post fot. Command output: Name
main::debugfile used only once: possible typo at /local/majordomo/demime
line 280. -p on unopened filehandle
What I've done is set up Mharc as a searchable archiver, and have list
messages
get sent to an address that adds them into the archive. RealSoonNow
I'll muck
with mailman to get the archive link from the Mailman pages to point to the
right place. Check http://www.team.net/archive to see what
I've poked around a bit in various list related archives, but haven't found
a definitive answer. Has anyone implemented some sort of add-on, filter
or whatever to give mailman something like the majordomo
'global taboo body' rejection capability? All the predefined content
filters seem to just
Depending on your shell, something like
foreach l ( `/your/path/to/mailman/bin/list_lists -b `)
echo -n $l
/your/path/to/mailman/bin/list_members | wc -l
end
might do the trick.
mjb.
Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.
-Albert Einstein.
DEFAULT_URL_HOST = '10.20.1.163'
DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = '10.20.1.163'
10.* is an unrouted network. Any properly configured MTA will ignore anything
coming from an external host claiming to be 10.whatever.
mjb.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
There was a patch sent to the list about a year ago that allowed
one to use addresses of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] as automatically
approved addresses. We applied it to our Mailman 2.1.1 here at the
U of Utah School of Computing. It is real handy for professors to
add the teaching assistant
I could find nothing in the archive about open bug reports on outlook
and displaying addresses...
Why would stupid behavior in Outlook be considered a mailman bug?
If people want to use Microsoft's Virus Propagation Wizard to mangle
their mail, that should be their problem.
mjb.
Today's
While digging around in the FAQ and the archive, it seems there are many
references to setting 'accept_these_nonmembers' to a regular expression.
Does this actually work, and if so, can anyone provide a working example
for Mailman 2.1.1 we are running?
I'm assuming that one feature of majordomo,
The first line of configure should be something like
#! program_path
Does the program named in your configure file exist, and have the proper
permissions?
mjb.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
46 matches
Mail list logo
