cased
email when trying to determine if two list member addresses are the
same member is OK.
Thanks for the quick fix!
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆
+4
-koeln.de.
The only difference is in the case of the email address. I’m no expert
on CSRF attacks, but to me it seems as though the comparison should
perhaps disregard differences in case only?
Thanks,
Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02
Clemens Greiner (greinerc)
Christine Rath (crath1)
Viele Grüße
Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn, Listmaster - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer
2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.
smime
and "$" at the end.
# An 'en' key must be present and is used as fall-back if there are no
# questions for the currently set language.
Just uncomment that and add your question/answer pairs.
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
Am 13.05.20 um 19:42 schrieb Mark Sapiro:
> On 5/13/20 4:48 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we seem to have new entries in the error log. I believe they have only
>> started to appear with the recent updates, but I cannot swear to that:
>>
>> admi
ailList.py", line 849, in
CheckPending
admin(7095): op, data = v
admin(7095): ValueError: too many values to unpack
I have no idea what causes that, and I have not been able to reproduce it. It
only seems to happen with a minority of subscribe attempts.
Any ideas? Does anybody else see
ne provide me with a best-practices
on how to migrate?
I have only migrated a few lists for testing purposes, but at least with
Mailman 3.2 you just copy the .pck file and import it like this:
$ mailman import21 listname@domain /tmp/config.pck
This does not take care of list archives.
--
.:
It happened again yesterday. Details below.
--On 7. Februar 2018 um 12:43:18 +0900 Yasuhito FUTATSUKI
wrote:
In fact,
On 02/02/18 19:26, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
root@mailman3/usr/lib/mailman/bin]$ strace -p 1677
Process 1677 attached
recvfrom(10, ^CProcess 1677 detached
indicates the
--On 6. Februar 2018 um 08:01:18 -0800 Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 02/06/2018 03:51 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On 4. Februar 2018 um 12:54:43 +0900 Yasuhito FUTATSUKI
wrote:
As far as I read the code, if OutgoingRunner catch SIGINT during waiting
for response from the MTA, the signal
ight be a possible explanation, but what could cause
a SIGINT to be sent to the OutgoingRunner?
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne Un
--On 3. Februar 2018 um 19:13:33 -0800 Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 02/03/2018 01:03 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
Did you look at the out queue, and if so was there a .bak file there.
This would be the entry currently being processed.
I looked at the out queue, and there was no .bak file
Thanks for your reply!
On 02/02/2018 02:26 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
[root@mailman3/usr/lib/mailman/bin]$ lsof -p 1677
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF
NODE NAME python2.7 1677 mailman cwd DIR 253,0
4096 173998 /usr/lib/mailman
python2.7 1677 mailman rtd
(ESTABLISHED)
In both instances the OutgoingRunner was stuck on an SMTP connection. I had
to use "kill -9" to get rid of it.
Any ideas what might be causing that?
Cheers
Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Re
r the list, and with a modern server
duplicates are a non-issue.
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +4
tuning and parameters to reduce the number of pop ups.
This is what Mulberry does, which is one of the many reasons I'm still
using it even though it's de facto abandonware.
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenze
izational Domains in the context of DMARC handling. It looks to me as
if that doesn't cause any problems, but I thought I'd ask ...
Thanks, Sebastian
--
Sebastian Hagedorn - Listmaster - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02
Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK)
Universität zu Köln / Colog
e saw were *not* sent to the -owner address, but to the
list address using one of the admin addresses for the list in the
From:-header. On the MTA level the envelope-from was always
www-d...@dreadnoughtpc.com.
Cheers
Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Z
same thing
could happen again anytime. :-(
I have set out most critical lists to emergency moderation, but that's not
really practical in the long run.
Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZ
one - What do I do
for transport and therefore how do I configure Mailman to use it? I am
not using OSX server. Do I need to install postfix? Or is there a buried
implementation I can turn on?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Sebastian Hagedorn
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 1
disabled, by default Mailman keeps sending a few messages to
the address to check if it's working again. This is controlled by the
bounce_you_are_disabled_warnings setting.
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenze
--On 12. September 2016 um 18:06:14 -0700 Mark Sapiro
wrote:
On 09/12/2016 12:02 PM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
So far I haven't been able to understand what is going on. I can't find
any questionable requests in Apache's access log from the GSA. Any ideas
what could be caus
d it's our own
Google Search Appliance (GSA).
So far I haven't been able to understand what is going on. I can't find any
questionable requests in Apache's access log from the GSA. Any ideas what
could be causing this?
Thanks
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyert
Hi Mark,
On 5/21/16 12:47 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
There is only one Mailman instance in play, and I can actually see the
subscription request in /var/lib/mailman/lists/LISTNAME/request.pck.
I've been getting the email notification for a few days, but in the GUI
there are "
27;,
u'Universit\xe4tsklinikum M\xfcnster',
'redacted',
0,
'de')),
'version': (0, 1)}
[- end pickle file -]
This is Mailman 2.1.18. Any ideas?
Cheers
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Hagedorn -
munity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/5/$basearch/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/IUS-COMMUNITY-GPG-KEY
Cheers
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121, Zimmer 2.02
Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK)
Universität zu Köln / Cologne University
es in the new list and because one can always
easily remove the old list with bin/rmlist anyway.
Thanks for that! We could've used that often in the past and will be able
to do so from now on :-)
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Re
t an issue.
Cheers
Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.
--
Mailman-Us
--On 18. Dezember 2013 07:04:14 -0800 Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 12/18/2013 01:27 AM, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
I installed Mailman 2.1.17 last night (upgrade from 2.1.15) and decided
to give the SUBSCRIBE_FORM_SECRET feature a try, since we don't use
static subscribe forms. All seemed well
s.platform= linux2
admin(328): [- Environment Variables -]
admin(328): SERVER_SOFTWARE: Apache/2.2.3 (Red Hat)
admin(328): SCRIPT_NAME: /mailman/listinfo
...
When I looked at line 194 in /usr/lib/mailman/Mailman/Cgi/listinfo.py, I
noticed that it handles the SUBSCRIBE_FORM_SECRET feat
ascii utf8 in 5 of the files, namely:
archidxfoot.html
archidxhead.html
archtoc.html
archtocnombox.html
emptyarchive.html
You are right. I was lazy and just listed all the new ones.
I have fixed those and will commit the changes.
Thank you!
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52
but as far as I can tell
that hasn't happened. I've been wrong before, but I would assume that's a
bug?
Cheers, Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne Univer
--On 25. Juni 2012 08:22:32 -0700 Mark Sapiro wrote:
See the FAQ at <http://wiki.list.org/x/_4A9>.
Oops ... sorry. There was in fact a very old BounceRunner that had somehow
survived a restart of Mailman.
Thanks, Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zim
bounces. I understand that the "usual" reason for that is an unparseable
message, as the logging indicates, but in this case it's apparently a
failed open command.
Is that a race condition, a purely cosmetic issue, or something that should
be fixed?
Thanks, Sebastian
--
Sebastian
nd I found this to explain it:
mailman-2.1.15rc1]$ grep -r '2\.1\.14' *
Mailman/Version.py:VERSION = '2.1.14'
...
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne U
that?
I have revised the script and it should now work with all Python
versions that are acceptable for Mailman itself.
Thanks a lot!
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University -
noticed that there are so many dependencies on new features of
the mailbox module that it doesn't seem feasible to use Python 2.4. Do you
know what the minimum required Python version would be? I suggest you add
that info to the script.
Cheers, Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZK
also need to include after those definitions
add_virtualhost(DEFAULT_URL_HOST, DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST)
D'oh! Thanks, Mark, we actually had that, but in the course of the upgrade
I messed it up :( The add_virtualhost was placed *before* the definition of
the variables ...
Thanks for your he
LMAN_SITE_LIST, hostname)
return '%s...@%s' % (mm_cfg.MAILMAN_SITE_LIST, extra, hostname)
Shouldn't that use the DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST instead? I fixed our specific
problem by hardcoding the return value, but it seems to me that could be a
more general issue ...
Thanks, Sebastian
--
mparing the two.
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
pgpS9zgP1uR7d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Why don't you just stick with Apple's version?
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
.:.:.:.Skype: shagedorn.:.:.:.
pgpS
is ...
If the above is not the answer, send me the raw message.
Will do.
Thanks, Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
.:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
I had her send
it to me privately and it arrived OK.
Is there any way to figure out why Mailman discarded it? Its content is
innocuous, so I'd be willing to redirect it to Mark or whoever might be
interested in investigating this ...
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäud
thon 2.4, but I had been hoping for one
last update that supports 2.2 ...
Thanks, Sebastian
--
Sebastian Hagedorn - Listmaster - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
Universität zu Köln / Colog
take it's
input from a file?
Not exactly, but there's something similar: after your script has executed
newlist, it can configure the list from a file using config_list and
populate the list from a file using add_members. We have a Perl script that
does that.
--
.:.Sebastian H
ectly. Thank you very much!
This withlist mechanism is pretty cool, I must say.
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
Hi Mark,
--On 2. Juni 2008 18:22:09 -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
|
| every once in a while one of our list owners shoots themselves in the
| foot by deleting the value in "host_name". That breaks the list almost
| completely. Is there
Thanks, Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
.:.:.:.Skype: shagedorn.:.:.:.
pgpqoh6tj2zm1.pgp
Descri
-May/020190.html
>.
So now we have two reports of possible locking failures. We'll have to
keep watching.
There were instances before where listowner talked of strange phenomena,
but there never was any proof. I admit I never believed them ...
--
Sebastian Hagedorn - Listmaster - RZKR-
hing.
The automatic bounce processing could have
unsubscribed them, although I would have thought that the results of that
would show up in the "subscribe" log.
Yup. But see my next reply.
--
Sebastian Hagedorn - Listmaster - RZKR-R1 (Flachbau), Zimmer 18
Zentrum für angewandte Informat
lain what might have happened. Any ideas?
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
.:.
in the interim.
Thanks, that makes sense! The list does have content filtering and
"preserve" as its filter_action.
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
.:.Universit
--On 25. April 2008 10:16:27 -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
|
| No, it was a .pck file. I found this entry in the vette log:
|
| (3438) Message discarded, msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This should have nothing to do with anything in the '
Hi Mark,
thanks for your reply.
--On 25. April 2008 09:21:12 -0700 Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
|
| I just noticed a message in the "bad" directory. I looked at it with
| show_qfiles and it
hen delivered to the list.
Basically I'm curious why Mailman didn't consider the message "bad" that
time around. Is unshunt-processing somehow different from normal processing?
Thank, Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte
.
Then perhaps a moderator went to the admindb interface, which can keep a
list locked for a long time if it is processing a large list of requests.
Ah, I wasn't even aware of that. Anyway, they promised not do it like that
anymore, so I guess we're fine. Thanks for your help!
--
.:
Update: I just noticed that the number of messages in "in" is decreasing.
Could it be that something just overwhelmed Mailman so that now there is a
backlog that's slowly being worked through? I don't think we ever had such
issues prior to today.
Cheers, Sebastian
--
.:.
gt; self._switchboard.finish(filebase)
> continue
>
> That won't preserve the entry in the shunt queue, but it will prevent
> .bak files from accumulating.
Thanks. I've made that change.
--
Sebastian H
do they end up there?
Cheers, Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-478-5587.:.
es has accumulated for an owner
address.
Is something like that in the pipeline? Or is thsi situation too rare to
merit the effort? How do other sites handle this situation?
Thanks, Sebastian
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - U
do I delete a mailing list?
rmlist
--
Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Flachbau), Zi. 18, Robert-Koch-Str. 10
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-478-5587
pgpDohKtWtzEh.pgp
Description: PGP sign
cess" error.
I haven't heard about that but it seems to me as though launchd notices
that the new process is in the same process group as a previous one that's
died. I suppose that's why it considers the new one a "stray process". A
workaround might be to force
t's a feature that many of our listowners ask for. Fortunately there's
an alternative that doesn't require my help: the e-mail interface. You can
get a list of subscribers by sending a mail to listname-request with the
text
who
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Z
in? How are others dealing with this?
We delete it.
--
Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Flachbau), Zi. 18, Robert-Koch-Str. 10
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-478-5587
pgpsDrigKSJoa.pgp
Description: PG
63 matches
Mail list logo