On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 07:48 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I understand that, but the data/heldmsg* file could have been removed
external to Mailman before that.
I never found any heldmsg* on the system, nor any complaint
that such a file could not be written. Maybe could an strace of
the
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:12:18PM +0100, Andre van Kan wrote:
- cluster 1: runs the MTA (Postfix) and MM
- cluster 2: runs Horde and the MM-webinterface
- cluster 3: runs Cyrus-imapd
Cluster 1 and 2 share - via NFS - the MM-lists etc. I found out however
that data/heldms* was only
I understand that, but the data/heldmsg* file could have been removed
external to Mailman before that.
I never found any heldmsg* on the system, nor any complaint
that such a file could not be written. Maybe could an strace of
the appropriate qrunner be of some help?
The attached
On 11/5/2010 6:44 AM, André van Kan wrote:
I understand that, but the data/heldmsg* file could have been removed
external to Mailman before that.
I never found any heldmsg* on the system, nor any complaint
that such a file could not be written. Maybe could an strace of
the appropriate
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Can you send me off list a copy of Mailman/Cgi/admindb.py from your
system?
I received that. Thank you. Unfortunately, there's nothing there that
helps explain this issue. I can work up a patch to provide debug
logging, but before I do that, is there anything in Mailman's
Andre van Kan wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 07:12 -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Can you send me off list a copy of Mailman/Cgi/admindb.py from your
system?
I received that. Thank you. Unfortunately, there's nothing there that
helps explain this issue. I can work up a
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your reply.
Please post to the list, not to me personally.
Point taken. And sure, you are Mark, not Larry, sorry ;-)
However, the above messages, presumably from Mailman's vette log, come
from two different PIDs. Thus, I'm guessing that you are approving these
André van Kan wrote:
I found out that as soon as the list-administrator just selects the link in
the requires approval message as sent by mailman, (Reason: Post
by non-member to a members-only list) the message is discarded at that
very moment! (vette log update detected)
After that the
On 10/29/2010 8:11 AM, André van Kan wrote:
Hi Larry,
Although we have the same problem, ours is even weird in
some aspects. I made an test-list - groep3 - with two members.
If mail is send by a non-member, all messages are discarded
after approval:
Oct 29 15:59:09 2010 (20460) groep3:
We are running Mailman v2.1.13 on Solaris 9 Sparc. We have a list with about
13,000 members that we currently have emergency moderation turned on because
of previous problems with reply storms.
Today somebody sent a message to the list, which (of course) was held for
moderation. The list
* Rosenbaum, Larry M. rosenbau...@ornl.gov:
We are running Mailman v2.1.13 on Solaris 9 Sparc. We have a list with about
13,000 members that we currently have emergency moderation turned on
because of previous problems with reply storms.
Today somebody sent a message to the list, which
On 10/4/2010 1:06 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Rosenbaum, Larry M. rosenbau...@ornl.gov:
Oct 04 10:35:12 2010 (21271) X_Cohorts post from michael.x...@.edu
held,
message-id=2034674bf9d4714bae35b22bf073eef402e70...@ms-..edu: Post
to moderated list
Oct 04 10:38:26 2010
On 10/4/2010 11:51 AM, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
What caused the message to be discarded after it was approved?
Most likely, Content filtering - filter_action is Discard, and there
was nothing left of the message after content filtering. E.g. the
message was text/html or maybe
13 matches
Mail list logo
