[Mailman-Users] Contemplating new installation

2006-07-26 Thread Jon Loose
Hi, I'm contemplating using mailman in a new system setup, and am hoping I could get a heads up warning about potential problems from the list before killing too much time on it. I have installed mailman before, using postfix on a redhat (ClarkConnect) server. It took a bit of fiddling with,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Contemplating new installation

2006-07-26 Thread Mark Sapiro
Jon Loose wrote: First off, I've read that there are some unique issues with qmail/mailman. Does this make installation significantly harder than with a postfix system (it was as much as I could do to get the postfix/mailman system going - but I'm willing to persevere!) What are the main

Re: [Mailman-Users] Contemplating new installation

2006-07-26 Thread Brad Knowles
At 7:21 PM + 2006-07-26, Jon Loose wrote: The new project is a fedora core based server, purchased on a subscription. It runs qmail by default, Ouch. and has plesk running to give some web-based admin. Double ouch. Given the constraint that we

Re: [Mailman-Users] Contemplating new installation

2006-07-26 Thread Todd Zullinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brad Knowles wrote: At 7:21 PM + 2006-07-26, Jon Loose wrote: [...] Second, my previous install of mailman was 2.1.x running under /usr/local/mailman. I note that the fedora installation already seems to have mailman files distributed

Re: [Mailman-Users] Contemplating new installation

2006-07-26 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:22 PM -0400 2006-07-26, Todd Zullinger wrote: They've done whatever they've done and didn't ask for any involvement from us. That doesn't seem entirely fair to the Red Hat/Fedora folks. John Dennis of Red Hat very clearly solicited comment on these changes on mailman-developers