Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-06 Thread Edward Salm, PhD
=3d is the escape code for a =. That is direct HTML as translated. Regular HTML was used, so that part you were incorrect. However... You were right on the money about the footer! Wow, that did it. Thank you. What do you mean full personalization? I don't know what you are referring to? On

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-06 Thread Edward Salm, PhD
The email programs that sent the mail both Apple Mail and Thunderbird, so it appears that Microsoft is not the only culprit. I would have assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that Thunderbird uses standards. I have just contacted my webhost, hostforweb.com, regarding the Personalization option, as well

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-06 Thread Edward Salm, PhD
Thanks to everyone. All problems solved. That is, after I sent the message and found out my host had a 500/hour limit. *(@*(#[EMAIL PROTECTED] They raised it temporarily, and it was just sent. Whew. This was my first time working with mailman. It was a little quirky, but everything worked out.

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-05 Thread Lloyd Tennison
: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:11:40 -0700 Subject: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman I have an email blast that I contains tables and other HTML code. I sent the same message directly to my email account, and also through mailman. When sent directly, it is just fine; when sent via

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-05 Thread Lloyd Tennison
configuration change that takes seconds to do. - Original Message - From: Edward Salm, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mailman-users@python.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 02:14:54 -0700 Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman =3d is the escape code

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
Lloyd Tennison wrote: I aways recommend to use full personalization, too, in Mailman. Without it the bounce processing does not work as well. Personalization or full personalization only affects bounce processing if VERP_PERSONALIZED_DELIVERIES = Yes in mm_cfg.py. The thing which improves

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
Lloyd Tennison quoted Edward Salm, PhD However... You were right on the money about the footer! Wow, that did it. Thank you. It is known that cPanel Mailman's addition of msg_footer to HTML parts is broken. See http://forums.cpanel.net/showthread.php?t=61603. You will need to register at the

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-05 Thread Lloyd Tennison
:57 -0700 Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman Lloyd Tennison quoted Edward Salm, PhD However... You were right on the money about the footer! Wow, that did it. Thank you. It is known that cPanel Mailman's addition of msg_footer to HTML parts is broken. See

Re: [Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-05 Thread Mark Sapiro
Lloyd Tennison wrote: I thought they all still did not work, as stated in the FAQ's. Good to know. I will have to test it and see myself. Whether or not it works depends on your definition of 'work'. I'm not trying to contradict the FAQ at http://wiki.list.org/x/84A9 which is a good summary

[Mailman-Users] HTML table code broken via Mailman

2008-10-04 Thread Edward Salm, PhD
I have an email blast that I contains tables and other HTML code. I sent the same message directly to my email account, and also through mailman. When sent directly, it is just fine; when sent via Mailman it is not. Mailman is changing something which is breaking the code. I cannot figure out