On 03/30/2017 08:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Interesting. I know there's a pretty clear division between components in 3;
can the web interface run on a separate machine and point to a remote
instance of Mailman?
Yep! It's somewhat important to keep in mind that the REST API of Core is a
On 03/30/17 12:16, Mark Sapiro wrote:
On 03/30/2017 08:44 AM, Christian F Buser via Mailman-Users wrote:
However: What is the state of Mailman 2 at the moment? I think it is
still supported and developed. But will this change in the near or in
the distant future?
Mailman 2 is definitely end
On 04/01/2017 12:56 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:16:41 -0700, Mark Sapiro said:
>
>> Mailman 2 is definitely end of life. I am the only one actively
>> supporting it at this point and while I continue to offer help and fix
>> bugs, it's not what I want to be doing.
>
> Is
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:16:41 -0700, Mark Sapiro said:
>Mailman 2 is definitely end of life. I am the only one actively
>supporting it at this point and while I continue to offer help and fix
>bugs, it's not what I want to be doing.
Is there any planned date where security updates end?
Cheers,
On Mar 30, 2017, at 08:11 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>Interesting. I know there's a pretty clear division between components in 3;
>can the web interface run on a separate machine and point to a remote
>instance of Mailman?
Yep! It's somewhat important to keep in mind that the REST API of Core is
On 03/30/2017 08:08 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I'm afraid Node.js is still a requirement.
Of the web interface of course. Technically those are optional components,
but practically speaking if you want to control Mailman 3 via the web, that's
the only option.
Interesting. I know there's a
On Mar 30, 2017, at 04:11 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>I'm afraid Node.js is still a requirement.
Of the web interface of course. Technically those are optional components,
but practically speaking if you want to control Mailman 3 via the web, that's
the only option.
-Barry
On 03/30/2017 07:11 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Thinking about it some more, yes I believe it was Node.js. Apparently
Node.js isn't quite portable enough to run on SPARC.
I'm afraid Node.js is still a requirement.
Ok. No Mailman 3 for us. :-( Thanks for your response.
-Dave
--
On 03/30/2017 07:13 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
Does 3 yet run on anything other than Linux? The last time I looked at
it, it looked to be pretty much Linux-only. (My company's Solaris-based
mail servers aren't going away anytime soon.)
Unless v3 is different from v2 in this regard, mailman
On 3/30/2017 9:55 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
Does 3 yet run on anything other than Linux? The last time I looked at
it, it looked to be pretty much Linux-only. (My company's Solaris-based
mail servers aren't going away anytime soon.)
Unless v3 is different from v2 in this regard, mailman
On 03/30/2017 03:08 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>
> Thinking about it some more, yes I believe it was Node.js. Apparently
> Node.js isn't quite portable enough to run on SPARC.
I'm afraid Node.js is still a requirement.
--
Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers,
San
On 03/30/2017 05:27 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Does 3 yet run on anything other than Linux? The last time I looked
at it, it looked to be pretty much Linux-only. (My company's
Solaris-based mail servers aren't going away anytime soon.)
It should run on any *nix that supports Python 2, Python 3
On 03/30/2017 09:55 AM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>
> Does 3 yet run on anything other than Linux? The last time I looked
> at it, it looked to be pretty much Linux-only. (My company's
> Solaris-based mail servers aren't going away anytime soon.)
It should run on any *nix that supports Python 2,
On 03/30/2017 12:16 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
However: What is the state of Mailman 2 at the moment? I think it is
still supported and developed. But will this change in the near or in
the distant future?
Mailman 2 is definitely end of life. I am the only one actively
supporting it at this point
On 03/30/2017 08:44 AM, Christian F Buser via Mailman-Users wrote:
>
> However: What is the state of Mailman 2 at the moment? I think it is
> still supported and developed. But will this change in the near or in
> the distant future?
Mailman 2 is definitely end of life. I am the only one
Hi all
Every now and then, "Mailman 3" is mentioned on this list. As I
understand it, MM 3 is completely different from the current MM 2 we all
are using, and as Mark Sapiro wrote earlier today, questions regarding
MM3 belong somewhere else. And I think I'll be using MM 2 as long as MM
2 is
16 matches
Mail list logo