Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-04-01 Thread Dave McGuire
On 03/30/2017 08:35 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: Interesting. I know there's a pretty clear division between components in 3; can the web interface run on a separate machine and point to a remote instance of Mailman? Yep! It's somewhat important to keep in mind that the REST API of Core is a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-04-01 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 03/30/17 12:16, Mark Sapiro wrote: On 03/30/2017 08:44 AM, Christian F Buser via Mailman-Users wrote: However: What is the state of Mailman 2 at the moment? I think it is still supported and developed. But will this change in the near or in the distant future? Mailman 2 is definitely end

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-04-01 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 04/01/2017 12:56 PM, Sean McBride wrote: > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:16:41 -0700, Mark Sapiro said: > >> Mailman 2 is definitely end of life. I am the only one actively >> supporting it at this point and while I continue to offer help and fix >> bugs, it's not what I want to be doing. > > Is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-04-01 Thread Sean McBride
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:16:41 -0700, Mark Sapiro said: >Mailman 2 is definitely end of life. I am the only one actively >supporting it at this point and while I continue to offer help and fix >bugs, it's not what I want to be doing. Is there any planned date where security updates end? Cheers,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 30, 2017, at 08:11 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: >Interesting. I know there's a pretty clear division between components in 3; >can the web interface run on a separate machine and point to a remote >instance of Mailman? Yep! It's somewhat important to keep in mind that the REST API of Core is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Dave McGuire
On 03/30/2017 08:08 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: I'm afraid Node.js is still a requirement. Of the web interface of course. Technically those are optional components, but practically speaking if you want to control Mailman 3 via the web, that's the only option. Interesting. I know there's a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 30, 2017, at 04:11 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >I'm afraid Node.js is still a requirement. Of the web interface of course. Technically those are optional components, but practically speaking if you want to control Mailman 3 via the web, that's the only option. -Barry

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Dave McGuire
On 03/30/2017 07:11 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: Thinking about it some more, yes I believe it was Node.js. Apparently Node.js isn't quite portable enough to run on SPARC. I'm afraid Node.js is still a requirement. Ok. No Mailman 3 for us. :-( Thanks for your response. -Dave --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Dave McGuire
On 03/30/2017 07:13 PM, Carl Zwanzig wrote: Does 3 yet run on anything other than Linux? The last time I looked at it, it looked to be pretty much Linux-only. (My company's Solaris-based mail servers aren't going away anytime soon.) Unless v3 is different from v2 in this regard, mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Carl Zwanzig
On 3/30/2017 9:55 AM, Dave McGuire wrote: Does 3 yet run on anything other than Linux? The last time I looked at it, it looked to be pretty much Linux-only. (My company's Solaris-based mail servers aren't going away anytime soon.) Unless v3 is different from v2 in this regard, mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 03/30/2017 03:08 PM, Dave McGuire wrote: > > Thinking about it some more, yes I believe it was Node.js. Apparently > Node.js isn't quite portable enough to run on SPARC. I'm afraid Node.js is still a requirement. -- Mark Sapiro The highway is for gamblers, San

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Dave McGuire
On 03/30/2017 05:27 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: Does 3 yet run on anything other than Linux? The last time I looked at it, it looked to be pretty much Linux-only. (My company's Solaris-based mail servers aren't going away anytime soon.) It should run on any *nix that supports Python 2, Python 3

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 03/30/2017 09:55 AM, Dave McGuire wrote: > > Does 3 yet run on anything other than Linux? The last time I looked > at it, it looked to be pretty much Linux-only. (My company's > Solaris-based mail servers aren't going away anytime soon.) It should run on any *nix that supports Python 2,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Dave McGuire
On 03/30/2017 12:16 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: However: What is the state of Mailman 2 at the moment? I think it is still supported and developed. But will this change in the near or in the distant future? Mailman 2 is definitely end of life. I am the only one actively supporting it at this point

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 03/30/2017 08:44 AM, Christian F Buser via Mailman-Users wrote: > > However: What is the state of Mailman 2 at the moment? I think it is > still supported and developed. But will this change in the near or in > the distant future? Mailman 2 is definitely end of life. I am the only one

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 2 and 3

2017-03-30 Thread Christian F Buser via Mailman-Users
Hi all Every now and then, "Mailman 3" is mentioned on this list. As I understand it, MM 3 is completely different from the current MM 2 we all are using, and as Mark Sapiro wrote earlier today, questions regarding MM3 belong somewhere else. And I think I'll be using MM 2 as long as MM 2 is