On 4/4/2011 9:40 AM, Champyrivers wrote:
>
> my Task is to evaluate possible Performance Problems with Mailman. Sadly
> Google does not deliver the required Information, so maybe you can help me.
> We´re building a new Newsletter System for our University, we send about
> 5000 Mails to 1000 Subscr
Hi,
my Task is to evaluate possible Performance Problems with Mailman. Sadly
Google does not deliver the required Information, so maybe you can help me.
We´re building a new Newsletter System for our University, we send about
5000 Mails to 1000 Subscribers every Day. Can you tell by expirience th
Hien HUYNH HUU wrote:
>Hi all,
> Now I use mailman with qmail . Everyday I send a message to the maillist ,
> but the server takes 40 minutes to send about 10.000 emails (3-4msg/s) I
> think It's slow performance, isn't it ? because I hear that qmail can send
> about 10 millions messages per
* Hien HUYNH HUU :
>Now I use mailman with qmail . Everyday I send a message to the
>maillist , but the server takes 40 minutes to send about 10.000
>emails (3-4msg/s)
To remote destinations?
>I think It's slow performance, isn't it ? because I hear that qmail
>can send about
Hi all,
Now I use mailman with qmail . Everyday I send a message to the maillist ,
but the server takes 40 minutes to send about 10.000 emails (3-4msg/s) I think
It's slow performance, isn't it ? because I hear that qmail can send about 10
millions messages per day. That means It can send abo
Blatter, Nicholas wrote:
>
>Every message is taking almost exactly 80.1 seconds, with no derivation.
>Postfix's mailq is empty, and all other mail is getting through just
>fine.
>
>Anyone have any suggestions? Why is it taking so long for it to send
>each message?
Because it takes Postfix that l
Hello,
I'm using Mailman 2.1.5 and Postfix to manage a small (~500) member list
and I recently went through and removed everyone from the list, and then
added them back in. After doing so I was watching the progress of
sending the Welcome message, and noticed that Mailman is taking an
exceptionall
> Anyway, I am looking for some recommended hardware specs to run a list service
> with approx 500,000 users, with say 2-5 million emails per day.
Largest single list is one of the key performance affecting metrics -
some of the mailman stuff appears to hit scaling problems on the size of
an indi
> "PN" == Peter Nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PN> I understand all the MTA performance issues, there will be enough
PN> MTA servers and bandwith to handle the traffic, but my question is
PN> will mailman handle the load? Is anyone running a mailman
How do you make mailman submit a single
Hello List
FAQ: 1.15. What is the largest list Mailman can run?
http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.015.htp
Surely sf.net has much more traffic than the examples listed here as they have
over 700,000 users currently...
Anyway, I am looking for some recommended hardware
At 9:43 AM -0400 2003/07/26, Jon Carnes wrote:
Here is the section from the Release Notes that is pertinent to our
"pissing contest":
Add parallel queue runner code. Allows multiple queue runners per work
group (one or more queues in a multi-queue environment
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 06:03, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 7:43 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote:
>
> > Actually Brad, it looks like your knowledge of Sendmail is rather dated.
> > Sendmail has been doing this since 2001.
> >
> >http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/doc8.12/RELEASE_NOTES
Sigh..
At 7:43 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote:
Actually Brad, it looks like your knowledge of Sendmail is rather dated.
Sendmail has been doing this since 2001.
http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/doc8.12/RELEASE_NOTES
This is old. Check the RELEASE_NOTES for version 8.12.9 (which
has a majo
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:36, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 5:01 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote:
>
> > Right! Given decent equipment the MTA is the primary worry. For best
> > performance you really want to use an optimized MTA like Postfix.
> > Postfix shuffles slow responding mail sites to
At 5:01 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Jon Carnes wrote:
Right! Given decent equipment the MTA is the primary worry. For best
performance you really want to use an optimized MTA like Postfix.
Postfix shuffles slow responding mail sites to the end of the queue so
that they don't hold up the outflow of m
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 12:19, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "JS" == John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> JS> With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server /
> JS> 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible
> JS> with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers.
>
> I think it depends
At 12:19 PM -0400 2003/07/25, Vivek Khera wrote:
I think it depends on your MTA and whether you have personalization on
in Mailman (which will increase the number of messages being pumped
through). Also, sending mail tends to be disk-bound if you are not
network-bound.
In my experience, send
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:19:57 -0400
Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "JS" == John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server / 10Mbs, what sort
>> of performance should be possible with Mailman? Sends per hour / max
>> subscribers.
> I think it
> "JS" == John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JS> With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server /
JS> 10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible
JS> with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers.
I think it depends on your MTA and whether you have personalization on
in Mailman
With a dedicated Pentium 4 2GHz / 1 GB RAM server /
10Mbs, what sort of performance should be possible
with Mailman? Sends per hour / max subscribers.
John
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.co
"Bodnyk, Bruce W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm running mailman on a Compaq 450Mz Pentium II with 512Mb of memory. I
> started adding users by sending an email to the list-request and the
> email has about 50 names on it. I'm finding that Mailman is adding at max
> two people per minute.
>
>
I'm running mailman on a Compaq 450Mz Pentium II with 512Mb of memory.
I started adding users by sending an email to the list-request and the email
has about 50 names on it. I'm finding that Mailman is adding at max two
people
per minute.
I'm wondering whether this machine may be too slow to serv
Title: Mailman Performance
Dear List
I have strange problems with mailman.
Am using the following tools and respective versions.
Apache 1.3.13
sendmail 8.9
mailman 2.0.6
RH 6.1
Python 1.5.2
I have 2 problems:
Problem 1:
I created 2 lists named forum and response respectively, it was
w
> I just discovered/downloaded/installed mailman yesterday, and am
> getting horrible performance with it, so I hope this is an easy one.
>
> Any mailman operation takes > 5 secs; even bin/list_lists takes 7
> secs. Is it normal for it to take so long? I use list_lists as an
> example because I
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:04:03 -0800
Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doesn't surprise me. It's an interpreted language, so loading up
> the interpreter, then the code, then executing is going to take a
> certain fixed startup time. It will be completely dwarfed by mail
> connection time wh
Dan Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doesn't surprise me. It's an interpreted language, so loading up the
> interpreter, then the code, then executing is going to take a
> certain fixed startup time. It will be completely dwarfed by
> mail connection time when you start running an actual li
Doesn't surprise me. It's an interpreted language, so loading up the
interpreter, then the code, then executing is going to take a
certain fixed startup time. It will be completely dwarfed by
mail connection time when you start running an actual list.
Dave Disser wrote:
>
> I just discovered
I just discovered/downloaded/installed mailman yesterday, and am
getting horrible performance with it, so I hope this is an easy one.
Any mailman operation takes > 5 secs; even bin/list_lists takes 7
secs. Is it normal for it to take so long? I use list_lists as an
example because I want to lea
28 matches
Mail list logo