Re: [Mailman-Users] Newer postfix: unused parameter: mailman_destination_recipient_limit=1

2012-03-10 Thread ml
Le 2012-03-09 20:28, Larry Stone a écrit : On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Tanstaafl wrote: Hi all, I've had this parameter defined in my postfix ever since it was first set up (not by me), and most everything I read online says it should be there. But, the newer versions of postfix now provide

Re: [Mailman-Users] Newer postfix: unused parameter: mailman_destination_recipient_limit=1

2012-03-10 Thread Larry Stone
On Mar 9, 2012, at 3:17 PM, ml wrote: this depend version the postfix ks3 ~]# postconf -n | grep mailman alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases , hash:/etc/postfix/aliases,hash:/etc/mailman/aliases mailman_destination_recipient_limit = 1 virtual_alias_maps =

Re: [Mailman-Users] Newer postfix: unused parameter: mailman_destination_recipient_limit=1

2012-03-10 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Larry Stone lston...@stonejongleux.com: While whether or not you get unused parameter warnings (and they are just warnings) depends on the Postfix version (the check was added in Postfix 2.9.0), whether or not mailman_destination_recipient_limit is used depends on whether or not you have

[Mailman-Users] Newer postfix: unused parameter: mailman_destination_recipient_limit=1

2012-03-09 Thread Tanstaafl
Hi all, I've had this parameter defined in my postfix ever since it was first set up (not by me), and most everything I read online says it should be there. But, the newer versions of postfix now provide warnings for unused parameters, and that is what I'm getting for this one parameter:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Newer postfix: unused parameter: mailman_destination_recipient_limit=1

2012-03-09 Thread Larry Stone
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Tanstaafl wrote: Hi all, I've had this parameter defined in my postfix ever since it was first set up (not by me), and most everything I read online says it should be there. But, the newer versions of postfix now provide warnings for unused parameters, and that is what