A couple of weeks ago our Mailman 2.0 server crashed (a physical
problem, it wasn't Mailman's fault!) and we had to upgrade to 2.1 in a
real hurry. As a result, I had to copy the entire ~mailman/data
directory... which may not have been such a good idea:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/data]$ ls -al | w
Chris Waltham wrote:
>A couple of weeks ago our Mailman 2.0 server crashed (a physical
>problem, it wasn't Mailman's fault!) and we had to upgrade to 2.1 in a
>real hurry. As a result, I had to copy the entire ~mailman/data
>directory... which may not have been such a good idea:
>
>[EMAIL PR
On Apr 7, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Chris Waltham wrote:
>
>> A couple of weeks ago our Mailman 2.0 server crashed (a physical
>> problem, it wasn't Mailman's fault!) and we had to upgrade to 2.1
>> in a
>> real hurry. As a result, I had to copy the entire ~mailman/data
>> directory.
Chris Waltham wrote:
>
>With the exception of 3-4 lists (out of 800+), I let the "make update"
>command run so I presume that actually upgraded the lists. I think I
>might just delete the holdmsg files en masse, I can't see why
>(organizationally) I should need to keep them.
When you delete
Hi Mark,
Just to re-visit this...
On Apr 8, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Waltham wrote:
With the exception of 3-4 lists (out of 800+), I let the "make
update"
command run so I presume that actually upgraded the lists. I think I
might just delete the holdmsg files en masse, I
Chris Waltham wrote:
>Hi Mark,
>
>Just to re-visit this...
>
>On Apr 8, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
>
>> Chris Waltham wrote:
>>>
>>> With the exception of 3-4 lists (out of 800+), I let the "make
>>> update"
>>> command run so I presume that actually upgraded the lists. I think I
>>> m
On May 7, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
I looked at my heldmsg files (all 40,000 of them :-)) and there
are a
number patterns. Most heldmsg files are from a handful of lists
(let's
call them baseball and football). If I do a dumpdb of the hockey
list's pending.pck file, this is the ou
Chris Waltham wrote:
>Can you think of an easy way to discard all the messages in
>request.pck _except those_ which still have tokens remaining in
>pending.pck?
If you're willing to accept that the only messages that have unexpired
tokens left in pending.pck are those newer than PENDING_REQU
On May 7, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Waltham wrote:
Can you think of an easy way to discard all the messages in
request.pck _except those_ which still have tokens remaining in
pending.pck?
If you're willing to accept that the only messages that have unexpired
tokens left in
On May 8, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Chris Waltham wrote:
On May 7, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
Chris Waltham wrote:
Can you think of an easy way to discard all the messages in
request.pck _except those_ which still have tokens remaining in
pending.pck?
If you're willing to accept that t
10 matches
Mail list logo
