[Mailman-Users] Remove someone from list of lists but not from child lists?

2016-05-28 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Ryan Stasel writes: > So, I’ve had some requests to remove people from “everyone” but > obviously keep them in their respective “child list”. Is this > possible? I think this might be possible in Mailman 3 (but would be a new feature, not implemented yet), but not in Mailman 2. I suppose

Re: [Mailman-Users] Remove someone from list of lists but not from child lists?

2016-05-27 Thread Ryan Stasel
> > > So, as long as you don't have things like @child_listname in the > "everyone" list's accept_these_nonmembers, you can just remove the > problem posters from that setting and their posts will then be handled > according to generic_nonmember_action. > > They will still receive posts to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Remove someone from list of lists but not from child lists?

2016-05-27 Thread Ryan Stasel
> On May 27, 2016, at 12:57 , Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 05/27/2016 12:40 PM, Ryan Stasel wrote: >> >> Sorry, it’s not wanting to remove problem posters, sadly, that’s not >> currently an option. The question is can I remove people from receiving >> emails to the everyone

Re: [Mailman-Users] Remove someone from list of lists but not from child lists?

2016-05-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/27/2016 12:40 PM, Ryan Stasel wrote: > > Sorry, it’s not wanting to remove problem posters, sadly, that’s not > currently an option. The question is can I remove people from receiving > emails to the everyone list, but NOT remove them from the child lists they’re > on. I’m guessing the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Remove someone from list of lists but not from child lists?

2016-05-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/27/2016 12:38 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 05/27/2016 11:23 AM, Ryan Stasel wrote: >> >> Sorry, you’re right, while the lists are members, they’re all set to >> “nomail”. > > > Why are the list's members at all? I see that's not correctly punctuated. I meant "why are the sublists

Re: [Mailman-Users] Remove someone from list of lists but not from child lists?

2016-05-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/27/2016 11:23 AM, Ryan Stasel wrote: > > Sorry, you’re right, while the lists are members, they’re all set to “nomail”. Why are the list's members at all? > The list does have a couple individuals, but not many. They’re really only > there so they can send. But obviously I could put

Re: [Mailman-Users] Remove someone from list of lists but not from child lists?

2016-05-27 Thread Ryan Stasel
Hi Mark, Sorry, you’re right, while the lists are members, they’re all set to “nomail”. The list does have a couple individuals, but not many. They’re really only there so they can send. But obviously I could put them in non-members. Nothing is in regular_exclude_lists. regular_include_lists

Re: [Mailman-Users] Remove someone from list of lists but not from child lists?

2016-05-27 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 05/27/2016 10:38 AM, Ryan Stasel wrote: > > So, I’ve had some requests to remove people from “everyone” but obviously > keep them in their respective “child list”. Is this possible? I need more specifics to answer. > The everyone list is set up with the child lists being members, then

[Mailman-Users] Remove someone from list of lists but not from child lists?

2016-05-27 Thread Ryan Stasel
All, Just a quick question that I’m sure the answer is “not possible”. I have several lists that are subsets of users (faculty, staff, etc). Then we have a list of lists called “everyone”. But that “everyone” list gets abused by members sending out crap that people really don’t care to see.