On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:05:58 +0900
Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org wrote:
I doubt that has been updated. Recently, most users
seem to prefer
the bundled archiver (Pipermail), or 3rd party services.
Richard used
to be a regular on Mailman channels but I haven't seen
him for a
while.
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:19:20 -0800
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.net wrote:
Just for fun, I applied both the prerequisite
modinc-2.1.12-0.1.patch
and the mhonarc-2.1.12-0.1.patch to Mailman 2.1.18-1
Both patches failed to patch Mailman/Version.py because
the 2.1.18-1
DATA_FILE_VERSION is 105 and
On 12/05/2014 01:14 PM, Karl Zander wrote:
Pipermail seems place the file into separate URL and give it a generic
filename. Maybe I am missing some setting and Pipermail can keep the
message and attachment together?
You're probably not overlooking any setting.
The pipermail archiver
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Just for fun, I applied both the prerequisite modinc-2.1.12-0.1.patch
and the mhonarc-2.1.12-0.1.patch to Mailman 2.1.18-1
OK, it's raining here (hooray!) and a slow day, so I went further and
created http://www.msapiro.net/mm/mhonarc-2.1.18-1.1.patch.
This is Richard's
I realize MHonArc is not part of Mailman.
The Mailman FAQ indicates patches are available at
http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/index.html
The patches listed there are up to version 2.1.12 of
Mailman. Anyone aware of any patches for Mailman 2.1.18?
Or even 2.1.17?
Thank you
Karl Zander writes:
The Mailman FAQ indicates patches are available at
http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/index.html
The patches listed there are up to version 2.1.12 of
Mailman. Anyone aware of any patches for Mailman 2.1.18?
Or even 2.1.17?
I doubt that has been
On 12/04/2014 05:05 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
After a quick look at the patch I'd guess a 50% change that nothing
relevant to MHonArc except the version number has changed since
2.1.12, and a 90% chance that any fixes needed are *very* simple.
Have you tried that patch and had it fail?
Mark,
First off, to clarify, yes we're using version 2.1.18-1.
Next, the Version.py issue has been resolved. I had forgotten to apply
the modinc prerequisite patch.
The only error that remains when applying the mhonarc patch is:
Hulk #2 FAILED at 106.
1 out of 2 hulks FAILED -- saving rejects
On 07/18/2014 12:10 AM, Peter Knowles wrote:
The only error that remains when applying the mhonarc patch is:
Hulk #2 FAILED at 106.
1 out of 2 hulks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Mailman/Mailbox.py.rej
The problem with the patch is that the file it is based on ended at the
point where
Mark,
So if I understand correctly, based on your patch, I apply things in the
following order:
1. modinc.patch
2. mhonarc.patch
3. Mailbox.py.patch
*** the latter patch addressing what the mhonarc patch didn't due to
Mailman changes that were made post-patch release. ***
Best Regards,
Peter
On 07/18/2014 10:40 AM, Peter Knowles wrote:
So if I understand correctly, based on your patch, I apply things in the
following order:
1. modinc.patch
2. mhonarc.patch
3. Mailbox.py.patch
*** the latter patch addressing what the mhonarc patch didn't due to
Mailman changes that were
Mark,
I hate to be a pest.
1. I saved your patch in /usr/src
2. I enter the folder /usr/src/mailman-2.1.18-1
3. I run patch -p1 ../Mailbox.py.patch
4. The following message is presented:
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong
On 07/18/2014 10:59 AM, Peter Knowles wrote:
Mark,
I hate to be a pest.
1. I saved your patch in /usr/src
2. I enter the folder /usr/src/mailman-2.1.18-1
3. I run patch -p1 ../Mailbox.py.patch
4. The following message is presented:
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
can't
Mark,
One last question, as I'm a bit of novice when it comes to the patch
command.
When I run the other patches, it'd report something like Hunk #1 succeed
at 12 (offset -1 lines)., compared to when I ran your patch (as directed
above) it only spits out patching file Mailman/Mailbox.py with no
On 07/18/2014 11:20 AM, Peter Knowles wrote:
When I run the other patches, it'd report something like Hunk #1
succeed at 12 (offset -1 lines)., compared to when I ran your patch (as
directed above) it only spits out patching file Mailman/Mailbox.py
with no indication whether it was
Hi,
Is anyone familiar with the mhonarc patch found at:
http://www.openinfo.co.uk/mm/patches/mhonarc/
It seems when applied to 2.1.8, it cannot seem to patch Mailboxes.py and
Version.py.
During the patching process, here is the error produced:
Hunk #2 FAILED at 106.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED --
During the patching process, here is the error produced:
It would help if you actually provided the content of the .rej files.
Also, Are you really patching 2.1.8 or did you mean 2.1.18?
Hunk #2 FAILED at 106.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Mailman/Mailbox.py.rej
The
Hey everyone! Have a bit of a problem happening, and I'm hoping it's an
easy fix...
I went to set up the mhonarc patch with mailman 2.1.7 tonight.
I know, I know.. different versions (2.1.6 patch for mhonarc versus
mailman 2.1.7), so I'm taking my life in my hands.. but it seemed to
apply
18 matches
Mail list logo
