Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>As far as I can see this patch works great. As a positive side effect, is it
>possible that this patch also affects uncaught bounces? I recieve lots of
>uncaught bounces now where a SPAM-filter was required before the patch.
No. The patch has absolutely no effect on u
From: "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mark Sapiro wrote:
Helmut Schneider wrote:
Interesting, with "^subject:.*Declined.*"
Subject: Declined: [Somelist] Invitation to workshop on 13rd Dec. 2008
matches while
Subject: [Somelist] Declined: Invitation to workshop on 13rd Dec. 2008
does not.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Sapiro wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
>> Interesting, with "^subject:.*Declined.*"
>>
>> Subject: Declined: [Somelist] Invitation to workshop on 13rd Dec. 2008
>>
>> matches while
>>
>> Subject: [Somelist] Declined: Invitation to workshop on 13
Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>Interesting, with "^subject:.*Declined.*"
>
>Subject: Declined: [Somelist] Invitation to workshop on 13rd Dec. 2008
>
>matches while
>
>Subject: [Somelist] Declined: Invitation to workshop on 13rd Dec. 2008
>
>does not. Huh?!
It turns out that RFC 2047 encoded headers
Helmut Schneider wrote:
I have lots of problems with out-of-office replies. I tried to set up
a few filter rules using 2.1.10. Unfortuantely they don't catch them.
Are the expressions case sensitiv? Are the expressions basic or
extended?
What I tried yet:
^subject:.*Accepted.*
^subject:.*De
Michael Welch wrote:
>
>>^subject:.*is out of office.*
>
>I just added this rule as a "Reject" since we have had a few of these come to
>the list lately.
>^subject:.*out of office.*
>
>Would folks be willing to share the rules they have developed that would apply
>to general business lists? We ha
Hi friends.
>^subject:.*is out of office.*
I just added this rule as a "Reject" since we have had a few of these come to
the list lately.
^subject:.*out of office.*
Would folks be willing to share the rules they have developed that would apply
to general business lists? We have not had any pro
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Mark Sapiro wrote:
>> Helmut Schneider wrote:
>>>
>>> I have lots of problems with out-of-office replies. I tried to set up
>>> a few filter rules using 2.1.10. Unfortuantely they don't catch them.
>>> Are the expressions case sensitiv? Are the expressions basic or
>>
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Sapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Helmut Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] privacy options, SPAM, regex
Helmut Schneider wrote:
I have lots of proble
Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>I have lots of problems with out-of-office replies. I tried to set up a few
>filter rules using 2.1.10. Unfortuantely they don't catch them. Are the
>expressions case sensitiv? Are the expressions basic or extended?
>
>What I tried yet:
>
>^subject:.*Accepted.*
>^subjec
Hi,
I have lots of problems with out-of-office replies. I tried to set up a few
filter rules using 2.1.10. Unfortuantely they don't catch them. Are the
expressions case sensitiv? Are the expressions basic or extended?
What I tried yet:
^subject:.*Accepted.*
^subject:.*Declined.*
^subject:.*i
11 matches
Mail list logo
