On Friday 04 July 2003 10:51 pm, SysAdmin wrote:
> I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least it
> stayed up and running. Mailman's processes are all there, but no messages
> get delivered to the lists
Do you have a valid question? Or are you just ranting?
If you have
:S> Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
:S> recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
:S> much. As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to
:S> Majordomo (it has much better documentation, too). Sigh.
Is it possible your need
> "S" == SysAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
S> Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
S> recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
S> much. As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to
S> Majordomo (it has much better docu
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:51:44 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>
>Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
>recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
HAVE NOT tried it but many recommend Lyris.
fwiw
chas
--
powered by Linux, Suse 8.2 Pro + Agent under Wine
ysAdmin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman
At 7:51 PM -0700 2003/07/04, SysAdmin wrote:
> Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
&g
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
SysAdmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least
> it stayed up and running.
This is hardly a way to get either sympathy or help.
> Mailman's processes are all there, but no messages get deliver
