Odhiambo Washington writes:
> Okay, so Exim and Postfix act the same in their default configs
> unless one changes it. Mark (Dale), does your Postfix act the same
> way? I think it doesn't and maybe it's something you need to take a
> second look at??
Mark Dale's posts demonstrate knows his b
Mark Dale writes:
> Verizon began accepting mail again for lists on the European server
> about 6 hours ago.
Yay! And thank you for that followup.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
On 12/23/2016 11:24 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> Okay, so Exim and Postfix act the same in their default configs unless one
> changes it. Mark (Dale), does your Postfix act the same way? I think it
> doesn't and maybe it's something you need to take a second look at??
Why do you think this? O
Okay, so Exim and Postfix act the same in their default configs unless one
changes it. Mark (Dale), does your Postfix act the same way? I think it
doesn't and maybe it's something you need to take a second look at??
On 23 December 2016 at 22:17, Richard Shetron wrote:
> Postfix is the same. I
That's what Exim does, unless the sysadmin changes things!
On 23 December 2016 at 20:21, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 12/23/2016 06:50 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> >
> > I know Exim will only treat a session as a failure if it gets 5xx. Does
> > Postfix do the same?
>
>
> Yes, mostly. Postfix tre
Postfix is the same. I had to install a greylisting package to add
greylisting to postfix.
On 12/23/2016 9:50 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On 23 December 2016 at 17:36, Richard Shetron mailto:gue...@sgeinc.com>> wrote:
Maybe they were using some type of grey listing.
For those who
On 12/23/2016 06:50 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> I know Exim will only treat a session as a failure if it gets 5xx. Does
> Postfix do the same?
Yes, mostly. Postfix treats any 4xx as retryable and retries at
configured intervals until the message is delivered or
maximal_queue_lifetime (def
On 23 December 2016 at 17:36, Richard Shetron wrote:
> Maybe they were using some type of grey listing.
>
> For those who don't know:
> Grey listing is where the target MTA rejects with a retry error code the
> email from a new source for some period of time. Every site can set their
> own delay
Maybe they were using some type of grey listing.
For those who don't know:
Grey listing is where the target MTA rejects with a retry error code the
email from a new source for some period of time. Every site can set
their own delay. Most spammers won't retry so it gets rid of a lot of
spam.
Thanks for the suggestion on the mailop list Jim.
Verizon began accepting mail again for lists on the European server
about 6 hours ago.
No light was shed as to why or what changed their view. Not only Verizon
but AT&T as well, at around the same time - a little puzzle that's
probably best l
Mark Dale writes:
> We haven't brushed Odhiambo off, but rather have worked with him on this
> problem trying to fix it. However,
I'm sorry if I gave the impression that you did, everything Odhiambo
wrote indicates that you have been very helpful, and I took that for
granted. By support staff
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Mark Dale wrote:
> Hi Odhiambo and Steve,
>
> I'm one of the co-owners of MailmanLists.net that is mentioned in this post.
>
> As Odhiambo said, we've recently moved one of the servers that hosted
> Odhiambo's list. This involved a change of IP address, and at the
Hi Odhiambo and Steve,
I'm one of the co-owners of MailmanLists.net that is mentioned in this post.
As Odhiambo said, we've recently moved one of the servers that hosted
Odhiambo's list. This involved a change of IP address, and at the same
time the problem with Verizon kicked into play.
All
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 08:45:35PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> True. We then migrated the list to another of their servers that already
> existed, but the rejections
> became even more.
I'd still do a gradual ramp-up to N recipients with the 'standard' type of
messages/headers/patterns for
On 21 December 2016 at 20:09, Adam McGreggor
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:11:16PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > one of their co-lo facilities in the US closed down and they had to move
> to
> > another co-lo. This obviously involved migration of servers/ change of IP
> > addresses
Quoting Adam McGreggor (adam-mail...@amyl.org.uk):
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:11:16PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > one of their co-lo facilities in the US closed down and they had to move to
> > another co-lo. This obviously involved migration of servers/ change of IP
> > addresses and
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:11:16PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> one of their co-lo facilities in the US closed down and they had to move to
> another co-lo. This obviously involved migration of servers/ change of IP
> addresses and this has not gone well for one of my mailing lists which has
Just for the record, I have been hosting with mailmanlists.net for the last
three or so years and I am very happy with them. The only problem is that
one of their co-lo facilities in the US closed down and they had to move to
another co-lo. This obviously involved migration of servers/ change of IP
Hi to East Africa
I do not have any information about their "reputation" with Verizon and
AT&T, but our organization uses digimouse.eu for mail, mailing lists and
web.
You may want to mention my name when contacting them (no, I do not get
any compensation for my "advertising").
Christian
--
> -Original Message-
> From: Mailman-Users [mailto:mailman-users-
> bounces+brian=emwd@python.org] On Behalf Of William Bagwell
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 6:59 PM
> To: mailman-users@python.org
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman hosting needed
>
> On Sunday 2
On Sunday 27 January 2013, Ed Kasky wrote:
> I just did exactly what you are doing for the same reasons...
>
> I moved everything over to Asmallorange and so far I have been very happy.
Long time ASO customer... They have a strict 1,000 emails per hour limit so a
discussion list with 250 members
I just did exactly what you are doing for the same reasons...
I moved everything over to Asmallorange and so far I have been very happy.
http://asmallorange.com/
On 1/27/2013 12:43 AM, James Reid wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been running my own server hosting (amongst other things) mailman
for t
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've been running my own server hosting (amongst other things) mailman for
> the last 10+ years using a combination of either my own server, or more
> recently VPS.
>
> However, I've got to the point in my life where it is too much work to
maintain
> the servers myself, so am n
Sean Carnahan wrote:
> The lists are one for 5,000 and another of around 19,000 people?
>
> My present hosting company only allows 1,000 email per hour.
For lists of these sizes, you're probably going to need to use a
professional list host. If you google on "email list host" or similar
phrases,
I typically send out one newsletter 3 times avg a week.
Peak Hour for email outs are around 12 AM central time or 2 AM central time
or I can work around best times.
Thanks for any assistance.
sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Car
If all the lists are similar to yours then that setup would work fine.
If the lists are going to be more like this one (with a lot of messages
per day) then you should go with at least a 600Mhz box, and go for the
512Mb RAM so that you can run some Spam filtering on the box as well.
Good Luck - J
26 matches
Mail list logo
