I have done this, but the subject line remains imperturbable.
Alain
On 5 Feb 2023, at 3:10, John Doherty via mailmate wrote:
On Sat 2023-02-04 06:27 PM MST -0700,
wrote:
I tried to run the command: Before it is executes there was a
dialog-box to ask for some permission (I don't remember ex
On 5 Feb 2023, at 11:57, aisrael wrote:
> I have done this, but the subject line remains imperturbable.
>
>> System Preferences->Security & Privacy->Privacy->Full Disk Access
It's the “Automation” permission which is needed.
--
Benny
https://freron.com/become_a_mailmate_patron/
Thanks Benny, it works now. It says it has to be used with care : does
it mean that as long as the automation permission is granted, it may
affect all the message subjects?
Alain
On 5 Feb 2023, at 13:12, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 5 Feb 2023, at 11:57, aisrael wrote:
I have done this, b
On 5 Feb 2023, at 13:21, aisrael wrote:
> Thanks Benny, it works now. It says it has to be used with care : does it
> mean that as long as the automation permission is granted, it may affect all
> the message subjects?
No, a subject is only changed when you explicitly change it. The window show
On 4 Feb 2023, at 10:27, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
> Orange: The URL of a blocked image
>
> Red: It's either a link to an `http:` URL (which is *always* unsafe) or
> MailMate detected that the displayed text of a link looks like a URL, but the
> actual link does not match it.
>
> Normal: https:/
I would have nothing against a Note feature, even if restricted to
Mailmate, but I guess there are more important things to implement.
You mention side effects of the automation procedure :what are they?
Alain
On 5 Feb 2023, at 14:06, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 5 Feb 2023, at 13:21, aisrael
On Sun 2023-02-05 11:15 AM MST -0700, wrote:
I would have nothing against a Note feature, even if restricted to
Mailmate, but I guess there are more important things to implement.
You mention side effects of the automation procedure :what are they?
From the dialog box:
Be aware of the follo
Gee, doesn’t sound like changing a subject on existing message is such
a great idea. I’d rather send a new message with the updated info.
Possible problems related making a change outweigh the usefulness IMO.
Respectfully,
Henry Seiden
- -
Techworks Pro Co.
E: infotechworksprocom
W: http://tec
Yup, I never even noticed before that this option existed and can't
really think of why I would want to do it. But different strokes, etc.
Maybe someone has a reason that I haven't thought of.
The only item I ever use from the Command menu is BBEdit->Edit. Don't
use it that often but am really
On 5 Feb 2023, at 20:33, John Doherty via mailmate wrote:
> Yup, I never even noticed before that this option existed and can't really
> think of why I would want to do it. But different strokes, etc. Maybe someone
> has a reason that I haven't thought of.
I believe the typical use case is some
On 5 Feb 2023, at 11:42, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 5 Feb 2023, at 20:33, John Doherty via mailmate wrote:
Yup, I never even noticed before that this option existed and can't
really think of why I would want to do it. But different strokes,
etc. Maybe someone has a reason that I haven't tho
On Sun 2023-02-05 12:42 PM MST -0700, wrote:
Yup, I never even noticed before that this option existed and can't
really think of why I would want to do it. But different strokes, etc.
Maybe someone has a reason that I haven't thought of.
I believe the typical use case is something like this:
John Doherty via mailmate wrote (at 12:27 PM on Sunday, February 5, 2023):
> On Sun 2023-02-05 12:42 PM MST -0700, wrote:
>
>> Yup, I never even noticed before that this option existed and can't really
>> think of why I would want to do it. But different strokes, etc. Maybe
>> someone has a rea
How about this: modify the subject on the reply instead of modifying the
sender’s email subject or other.
For goofy subjects in the email on reply I add an additional item
enclosed in brackets ([])> So I can sort by the original
(“Question:” or otherwise) so it makes sense to me.
Chances are
On 5 Feb 2023, at 12:36, John Cooper wrote:
I miss Eudora's powerful abilities too, but as Benny mentioned, they
become more difficult both to implement and to use an an IMAP world.
Eudora used IMAP APPEND to upload the edited message to the mail store,
and DELETE/EXPUNGE to get rid of the o
On 2/5/23 19:17, Henry Seiden wrote:
Gee, doesn’t sound like changing a subject on existing message is such a
great idea. I’d rather send a new message with the updated info.
Possible problems related making a change outweigh the usefulness IMO.
Respectfully,
Henry Seiden
One usage case. Wh
On 6 Feb 2023, at 9:36, John Cooper wrote:
> John Doherty via mailmate wrote (at 12:27 PM on Sunday, February 5, 2023):
>
>> On Sun 2023-02-05 12:42 PM MST -0700, wrote:
>>
>> I have one long-term and pretty regular correspondent who nearly always uses
>> terrible subjects (e.g., "question") a
On 5 Feb 2023, at 14:01, Malcolm Fitzgerald wrote:
On 6 Feb 2023, at 9:36, John Cooper wrote:
John Doherty via mailmate wrote (at 12:27 PM on Sunday, February 5,
2023):
On Sun 2023-02-05 12:42 PM MST -0700,
wrote:
I have one long-term and pretty regular correspondent who nearly
always u
the thing i miss most from VM is being able to edit a received message.
you could edit anything, headers, body, ... but i think VM kinda died
some years ago.
randy
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mai
Same!
cheers
Simon
--
Simon Kaplan
si...@kaplan.id.au
+61 411 511 122
“Succass is not final. Failure is not fatal. It is the courage to
continue that counts.” (Winston Churchill)
On 6 Feb 2023, at 0:51, Shoshanna Green wrote:
On 4 Feb 2023, at 10:27, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
Orange: T
20 matches
Mail list logo
