On 14 Dec 2017, at 13:18 (-0500), Randall Meadows wrote:
On 14 Dec 2017, at 10:44, Tracy Valleau wrote:
As an Apple Developer since 1978, I can say that I quit using TM
years ago. It is a consumer-level product, with modest capabilities
and horrible reliability.
You asked for a solution. Yo
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 Randall Meadows wrote:
>Neither of which, though, do "versioned" backups like TM does, right?
>You only get the most recent "snapshot" of the drive, not any history of
>any items?
CS can be set up to keep archived copies of changed or deleted items. I have it
archive the
On 14 Dec 2017, at 13:18, Randall Meadows wrote:
On 14 Dec 2017, at 10:44, Tracy Valleau wrote:
As an Apple Developer since 1978, I can say that I quit using TM
years ago. It is a consumer-level product, with modest capabilities
and horrible reliability.
You asked for a solution. You need m
On 14 Dec 2017, at 10:44, Tracy Valleau wrote:
As an Apple Developer since 1978, I can say that I quit using TM years
ago. It is a consumer-level product, with modest capabilities and
horrible reliability.
You asked for a solution. You need more robust backup software, which
offers a mimicki
I can only second what Tracey says.
I use Carbon Copy Cloner AND Chronosync as they have slightly different
use cases. I tend to use Chronosync for full archived backups and CCC
for disk clones but thats just me. I suspect I could use only one system
and be very happy.
I have had too many is
As an Apple Developer since 1978, I can say that I quit using TM years
ago. It is a consumer-level product, with modest capabilities and
horrible reliability.
You asked for a solution. You need more robust backup software, which
offers a mimicking of TM.
Two extremely reliable options are Ca
