Benny,
I can verify that r5980 is able to start up. Will let you know if
there are any other issues seen.
Thanks!
Steve Mayer
smaye...@me.com
On 6 Sep 2023, at 4:15, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 3 Sep 2023, at 15:34, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 3 Sep 2023, at 15:27, Eric Sharakan via m
On 3 Sep 2023, at 15:34, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
> On 3 Sep 2023, at 15:27, Eric Sharakan via mailmate wrote:
>
>> Hi Benny (and others), I'm currently running r5975 successfully. I've
>> noticed a couple minor issues, which I've reported via the 'Send
>> Feedback...' menu item. Benny, do yo
On 3 Sep 2023, at 14:10, Henry Seiden wrote:
> Benny,
>
> Please understand, I continue to support your efforts. Despite what others
> here call “being salty”, I remain a fan and user of a level that works for my
> needs, presently experimental build 1.14 (r5978). If anyone needs a more
> stabl
On 2023-09-03 at 06:42:11 UTC-0400 (Sun, 03 Sep 2023 11:42:11 +0100)
Steve Hodgson
is rumored to have said:
When I check for (beta) updates I get the message “5964 is the
latest version available. You have version 5965.” And the beta
release on the website is 5937.
Where are you all getting
Thanks for the guidance and explanations, Benny. Will do.
Though for right now, 5978 seems pretty good on the items you mention.
Respectfully,
Henry Seiden
- -
Techworks Pro Co.
E: infotechworksprocom
W: http://techworkspro.com
On 3 Sep 2023, at 9:34, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
On 3 Sep 2023,
On 3 Sep 2023, at 15:27, Eric Sharakan via mailmate wrote:
> Hi Benny (and others), I'm currently running r5975 successfully. I've
> noticed a couple minor issues, which I've reported via the 'Send Feedback...'
> menu item. Benny, do you want us to report on issues we find on these
> experime
On 3 Sep 2023, at 7:27, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
> On 3 Sep 2023, at 12:47, Charlie Clark wrote:
>
>> That's because Benny considers these releases too buggy even for tests.
>
> Just a quick update on this. This is still true, and I'm working hard to get
> back to something usable. Right now, my
Benny,
Please understand, I continue to support your efforts. Despite what
others here call “being salty”, I remain a fan and user of a level
that works for my needs, presently experimental build 1.14 (r5978). If
anyone needs a more stable product, recommend you try the latest test
build, r59
On 3 Sep 2023, at 12:47, Charlie Clark wrote:
> That's because Benny considers these releases too buggy even for tests.
Just a quick update on this. This is still true, and I'm working hard to get
back to something usable. Right now, my own build of MailMate is even worse
than r5978. Some times
That's because Benny considers these releases too buggy even for tests.
You can download all releases directly from the website but I'm personally
sticking with 5964.
Charlie
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/
When I check for (beta) updates I get the message “5964 is the latest version
available. You have version 5965.” And the beta release on the website is 5937.
Where are you all getting r5978?
Cheers,
Steve
On 2 Sep 2023, at 17:00, mailmate-requ...@lists.freron.com wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date:
11 matches
Mail list logo
