Re: [mailop] Gmail's postmaster tools

2015-07-09 Thread Gil Bahat
Much appreciated, +1. Registration: The GWT auth system has capability for delegated access, which other postmaster consoles (SNDS/mail.ru/yandex) don't implement. activating that would make it very easy to share this data with our ESP. Another thing you to consider is to connect that with Google

[mailop] Gmail's postmaster tools

2015-07-09 Thread Brandon Long
We announced our new postmaster tools today. These are targeted at higher volume "good" senders, and give you a bunch of high level stats on the mail from your domain that we're seeing. If you don't have access, your mail is either too spammy or you don't send enough of it. Unfortunately, it re-

Re: [mailop] Help with definitions in RFC5598

2015-07-09 Thread Franck Martin
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Matthew Black > wrote: > >> Would it be safe to say the ADMD is a nebulous term that is difficult to >> precisely define? > > > > Quite so. > > Yes it was tongue and cheek ;) The definition can be ea

[mailop] Need a contact at Facebook

2015-07-09 Thread Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Ultimate goal is to reach someone in legal at Facebook. I have an interesting infringement situation that they will want to jump on, but any contact will get me started on the path. Thank you! Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditatio

Re: [mailop] Help with definitions in RFC5598

2015-07-09 Thread Kurt Andersen (b)
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Matthew Black wrote: > Would it be safe to say the ADMD is a nebulous term that is difficult to > precisely define? Quite so. --Kurt ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listin

Re: [mailop] Help with definitions in RFC5598

2015-07-09 Thread Kurt Andersen (b)
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Matthew Black wrote: > *SINK*, used in Section 2.1.4 (paragraph 2). It appears to have a > mathematical meaning that does not appear as one the 40 definitions in my > dictionary. Think plumbing or electronics, not math: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_s

Re: [mailop] Help with definitions in RFC5598

2015-07-09 Thread Matthew Black
Frank Martin> for ADMD, there is a whole IETF workgroup that tries to define what it is really. I presume that was a bit tongue-in-cheek? Would it be safe to say the ADMD is a nebulous term that is difficult to precisely define? Couldn’t they just write that ADMD is the term for “an organizatio

Re: [mailop] Help with definitions in RFC5598

2015-07-09 Thread Franck Martin
for ADMD, there is a whole IETF workgroup that tries to define what it is really. http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dbound/charter/ On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Matthew Black wrote: > Can anyone help me out? I am going through *RFC5598 Internet Mail > Architecture* and need help with the defi

[mailop] Help with definitions in RFC5598

2015-07-09 Thread Matthew Black
Can anyone help me out? I am going through RFC5598 Internet Mail Architecture and need help with the definitions of two terms. https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc5598.pdf SINK, used in Section 2.1.4 (paragraph 2). It appears to have a mathematical meaning that does not appear as one the 40 defin

Re: [mailop] AT&T Delist issues.

2015-07-09 Thread Anne Mitchell
Jarle, Please contact me offlist and I'll see what we can do. Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law CEO/President ISIPP SuretyMail Email Reputation, Accreditation & Certification Your mail system + SuretyMail accreditation = delivered to their inbox! Figure Out if It's Worth It: http://www.isip

[mailop] AT&T Delist issues.

2015-07-09 Thread Jarle Skogstrand
Hi, For some time now our customers have not been able to send emails to sbcglobal.net users (prodigy.net). The bounces refers to att.net/block_inquiry.html. I have tried posting delisting request trough the forms on this site several times over the years but have yet to receive any reply or s