[mailop] Seeking Advice on Bellsouth and SBC Global

2016-03-31 Thread Brett Schenker
This is the situation I'm running in to. We had an IP range for years with little issues since I took over. We warmed up the new IP range over six months, things were going well. Around the end of the year SBC and Bellsouth started blocking the entire range, except two IPs (always two, never more,

Re: [mailop] Gmail red open padlock composing message

2016-03-31 Thread Brandon Long via mailop
I've pinged the team to see what the update is, but my guess is it's a daily log processing job, so we have to actually send you mail to validate it. Looks like you enabled it between 5-6am PDT, not sure what their cut-off is for percentage success or what, so it might be two days for your traffic

Re: [mailop] Still seeing Microsoft 5.4.0 issues?

2016-03-31 Thread Michael Wise
It’s a known issue, but the fix hit some snags. Confirmed that if you see exactly this error (“5.4.0”, no secondary code, no reason text) that treating it as a 4xx is ok. The devs are working as quickly as they can to get the fix deployed. Sorry for the inconvenience. Aloha, Michael. -- Michael

Re: [mailop] Still seeing Microsoft 5.4.0 issues?

2016-03-31 Thread Michael Wise
Sent! Will reply to the thread when I hear back! Much thanks for the data! Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? From: Maarten

Re: [mailop] Still seeing Microsoft 5.4.0 issues?

2016-03-31 Thread Maarten Oelering
Below are the sources with counts of “5.4.0" remote bounces for today. COL004-OMC4S16.hotmail.com (65.55.34.218),101 COL004-OMC4S9.hotmail.com (65.55.34.211),98 COL004-OMC4S7.hotmail.com (65.55.34.209),92 COL004-OMC4S11.hotmail.com (65.55.34.213),82 COL004-OMC4S17.hotmail.com (65.55.34.219),79 COL

Re: [mailop] Still seeing Microsoft 5.4.0 issues?

2016-03-31 Thread Michael Wise
If you could enumerate the XXs for us, just for today, that would help a lot, we suspect it's some sort of internal DNS timeout. Aloha, Michael. -- Sent from my Windows Phone From: Maarten Oelering Sent: ‎3/‎31/‎2016 1:01 PM To: Mic

Re: [mailop] Still seeing Microsoft 5.4.0 issues?

2016-03-31 Thread Maarten Oelering
I just queried some data at google scale and found bounces with “5.4.0” (nothing more). These are all remote (asynchronous) bounces. The source of the bounce is COL004-OMC4SXX.hotmail.com where XX varies. The recipient domain is mostly hotmail.com

Re: [mailop] Gmail red open padlock composing message

2016-03-31 Thread Franck Martin via mailop
I wanted to add, make sure you have compatible ciphers, you may have enabled STARTTLS but if you cannot negotiate a cypher, then the point is moot ;) A packet capture when STARTTLS is initiated will tell you what ciphers are offered and which one is negotiated. On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:03 PM, F

Re: [mailop] Gmail red open padlock composing message

2016-03-31 Thread Franck Martin via mailop
I guess, once they have positive data on your domain, they should update the icon: https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/saferemail/#search=eastlink.ca On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Kirk MacDonald < kirk.macdon...@corp.eastlink.ca> wrote: > With thanks to Google for pushing the cause, I im

Re: [mailop] Mail accepted by outlook.com/hotmail.com disappears.

2016-03-31 Thread Bill Campbell
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016, Michael Rathbun wrote: ... >An elephant superficially resembles a mouse. There are enormous structural >differences. An elephant is a mil-spec mouse. Bill -- INTERNET: b...@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6

[mailop] Gmail red open padlock composing message

2016-03-31 Thread Kirk MacDonald
With thanks to Google for pushing the cause, I implemented STARTTLS functionality on my org’s MX (as well as outbound SMTP with opportunistic STARTTLS). Does anyone have any insight into how long it might take Gmail to acknowledge the STARTTLS availability when composing a new message to a doma

Re: [mailop] Paging a chilli.nosignal.org admin: Expired Cert (was: Re: Mail accepted by outlook.com/hotmail.com disappears.)

2016-03-31 Thread Al Iverson
No worries, and thank you kindly for your effort in providing this resource for us all. Cheers, Al Iverson -- Al Iverson www.aliverson.com (312)725-0130 On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Andy Davidson wrote: > > Hi, all ! > > > > > > On 31/03/2016, 13:31, "mailop on behalf of Adam McGreggor" >

Re: [mailop] Paging a chilli.nosignal.org admin: Expired Cert (was: Re: Mail accepted by outlook.com/hotmail.com disappears.)

2016-03-31 Thread Andy Davidson
Hi, all ! On 31/03/2016, 13:31, "mailop on behalf of Adam McGreggor" wrote: >On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:01:07PM -0500, Al Iverson wrote: >> I emailed the list owners back on 3/20 about this as well...no response. :\ >> Hope somebody didn't die. > >I've seen one of the listadmins post on an

Re: [mailop] Still seeing Microsoft 5.4.0 issues?

2016-03-31 Thread Josh Nason
Hey Michael -- that's all we're seeing: Final-Recipient: rfc822;...@hotmail.com Action: failed Status: 5.4.0 On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Michael Wise wrote: > Is the, “5.4.0 “ the entire bounce code / response? > > If there’s more, we need to know to build a case. > > If that’s it, tha

Re: [mailop] Paging a chilli.nosignal.org admin: Expired Cert (was: Re: Mail accepted by outlook.com/hotmail.com disappears.)

2016-03-31 Thread Adam McGreggor
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:01:07PM -0500, Al Iverson wrote: > I emailed the list owners back on 3/20 about this as well...no response. :\ > Hope somebody didn't die. I've seen one of the listadmins post on another list recently. -- "If you think the idea of a portable shrine archaic then look no