Re: [mailop] Mysterious DKIM failure.

Good point. Due to DMARC these issues will be more apparent. We will revisit our encoding and canocalization guidelines. Thanks, Maarten > On 12 Dec 2016, at 21:23, Steve Atkins wrote: > >> >> On Dec 12, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Maarten Oelering > > wrote: >> >> DK

Re: [mailop] Mysterious DKIM failure.

Famous last words but...What's the worst that could happen? :) Whether or not you should ignore changes to whitespace and capitalization seems like a fairly trivial thing. On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Maarten Oelering wrote: > DKIMCore promotes the use of simple body canocalization: http://

Re: [mailop] Mysterious DKIM failure.

> On Dec 12, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Maarten Oelering > wrote: > > DKIMCore promotes the use of simple body canocalization: > http://dkimcore.org/deployment/dkim.html. Something that might not be the most robust configuration, given Microsoft's whitespace issues, though at the time it was written

Re: [mailop] Mysterious DKIM failure.

DKIMCore promotes the use of simple body canocalization: http://dkimcore.org/deployment/dkim.html. Should ESPs use relaxed body canocalization instead to avoid these (rare) validation issues? Thanks, Maarten Oelering Postmastery On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 at 20:29, Steve Atkins wrote: > > > > > On D