Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread John Levine
In article <9bd40d9d-1c4f-4859-8169-d270d2811...@wordtothewise.com> you write: >> https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ > >That doesn’t distinguish between forensic and summary reports, I don’t think. >It just says “XML” Aggregate reports are XML, forensic repor

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >You mean something like this (2,850 entries): > >https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ No, that's XML aggregate reports. R's, John ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mail

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread Laura Atkins
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Matt Vernhout wrote: > > You mean something like this (2,850 entries): > > https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ That doesn’t distinguish between forensic and summary reports, I don’t think. It just says “XML” laura > > Che

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread Matt Vernhout
You mean something like this (2,850 entries): https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ Cheers, Matt On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Gil Bahat via mailop wrote: > I believe Tim draegan from DMARCian would probably have all of them > covered in between his clients and so will Agari and Returnpath. The

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread Gil Bahat via mailop
I believe Tim draegan from DMARCian would probably have all of them covered in between his clients and so will Agari and Returnpath. They might be willing to share. On Jun 8, 2017 21:24, "Laura Atkins" wrote: Thank you to everyone who responded! On Jun 8, 2017, at 10:33 AM, John Levine wrote:

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread John Levine
In article <55507ff5-0daf-41a9-9c5e-093b23805...@wordtothewise.com> you write: >> If people want, I can make a summary of the addresses that have sent >> them to me and we can swap them around. I have about 62000 reports. > >Sounds like work. But if the list gets generated, I’ll take a copy :) He

[mailop] Sharp Decline in Mail Stats to Road Runner Addresses

2017-06-08 Thread Taylor Ferguson via mailop
Does anyone know if anything is happening to roadrunner domains? I'm seeing deliveries to the domains sharing the rr mx dropping significantly. ThanksTaylor Taylor Ferguson Delivery Consultant | Expert ServicesEmail Delivery. Simplified.___ mailop mailing

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread Laura Atkins
Thank you to everyone who responded! > On Jun 8, 2017, at 10:33 AM, John Levine wrote: > > In article you write: >> Is there a way to find out / determine who is sending DMARC forensic reports? > > Other than sending broken DMARC and seeing who reports back (as noted, > mailing lists are a go

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >Is there a way to find out / determine who is sending DMARC forensic reports? Other than sending broken DMARC and seeing who reports back (as noted, mailing lists are a good start) I'm not aware of any. If people want, I can make a summary of the addresses that have sent t

Re: [mailop] Email issues to mx01.perfora.net?

2017-06-08 Thread Frank Bulk
More here: http://status-1and1.com/#Incident Issues with the 1&1 Webmail Product Start:06/08/2017 9:28 AM Estimated end:Unknown Last update:06/08/2017 9:28 AM Type:Incident Affected services:E-Mail Description: We are experiencing issues with the 1&1 Webmail Product. You may experience login issue

Re: [mailop] Email issues to mx01.perfora.net?

2017-06-08 Thread Frank Bulk
I see that twitter is full of 1and1 complaints this morning. https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&q=1and1&src=typd Frank -Original Message- From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of frnk...@iname.com Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 10:22 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: [

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread Ken O'Driscoll via mailop
Posting to mailing lists that don't implement a DMARC work-around from a DMARC protected domain is a quick and dirty way to do a poll. From experience, while a few providers are sending forensic reports, many send fairly frequent aggregate reports which may also serve your purpose.  Ken. Need t

[mailop] DMARC forensic reports

2017-06-08 Thread Laura Atkins
Is there a way to find out / determine who is sending DMARC forensic reports? laura -- Having an Email Crisis? 800 823-9674 Laura Atkins Word to the Wise la...@wordtothewise.com (650) 437-0741 Email Delivery Blog: http://wordtothewise.com/blog

[mailop] Email issues to mx01.perfora.net?

2017-06-08 Thread frnkblk
Anyone else seeing delivery issues to mx01.perfora.net? Sample logs/data below: Frank Open (74.208.5.21) Error 181sec (399 TCP Read failed (Err Code Zero after 180 seconds) 180 sec) ubad=14022638, Site (sibleypresby.church/74.208.5.21) said: 450 Requested mail action not taken: mailbox unavailab

Re: [mailop] SNDS in Red after List Clean up

2017-06-08 Thread Vick Khera
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Chris Truitt wrote: > My question to you is what can be done to essentially educate Smart Screen > that our content, though containing medical jargon is acceptable to the end > user and to place it into the inbox, and how many days of clean sending > will it take t

[mailop] SNDS in Red after List Clean up

2017-06-08 Thread Chris Truitt
Hi Michael, I have a question regarding our inbox placement with Microsoft owned domains, in particular Hotmail that I hope you can assist me with. We are sending pharma educational content strictly to healthcare practitioners whom have opted in. The SNDS report indicates a lot of red in spite o

[mailop] Office365 ounces from Hotmail.co.uk

2017-06-08 Thread Daniel Baqueiro via mailop
Hi, I wonder if there's anyone from Microsoft out there that can advise bout some bounces we're seeing. Since yesterday, we started receiving bounces from protection.outlook.com when attempting delivery to hotmail.co.uk and live.co.uk. There's an assorted collection of responses but we're concern