Hi List
Well thank you for all the hints. I also (thanks to Al) found out, that
you need to set the browser language to english, to get to the propper
help page where the delisting request form can be found. With german,
you're lost :-)
But I would like to use that topic on a discussion about wha
Hi Benoit,
I assume you already checked M3AAWG's BCPs?
https://www.m3aawg.org/published-documents
I'm not familiar with _all_ of them, but that's a good source of ideas anyway.
Cheers,
--
Benjamin
-Original Message-
From: mailop On Behalf Of Benoit Panizzon
Sent: Monday, 1 October,
Sounds like you're doing MUCH correctly. Here is another suggestion:
Start limiting the ability of your end users to set up forwarders for
email accounts forwarding to freemail addresses. For starters, I
especially highly recommend not allowing anyone to auto-forward their
mail to ANY microsoft
Hello,
one of my customers has a strange issue with Facebook's mail system:
He tries to recover his password, Facebook says mail is sent. But on the side
of our mail server, we never receive even an SMTP connect from Facebook. Other
alias, same domain works without any problems.
Does anybody h
Is that mail actually coming from Facebook or are they using an ESP to manage
their invites?
laura
> On 1 Oct 2018, at 16:25, Marvin Gaube wrote:
>
> Hello,
> one of my customers has a strange issue with Facebook's mail system:
> He tries to recover his password, Facebook says mail is sent.
Hello,
it seems that Facebook is using it's own system, a test mail from
another account was delivered via mx-out.facebook.com
(66-220-144-147.mail-mail.facebook.com [66.220.144.147])
Best regards
Marvin Gaube
Am 01.10.2018 um 18:47 schrieb Laura Atkins:
> Is that mail actually coming from Fa
> From: Benoit Panizzon
> we mainly get the usual problems with customers who hand out their
> email credentials in reply to phishing emails or get trojans who steal
> them from their computers.
>
> To mitigate those problems we have implemented those mechanisms:
> * If count(IP) in delta time >
Hello all,
We recently removed the Sender header from outgoing emails in favour of
x-dkim-options, as the latter offers the ability to more easily switch
between selectors. However, following the change, users began reporting an
increase in out-of-office replies, ostensibly because some of their
s
On 1 Oct 2018, at 10:16, Jonathan Leist wrote:
We recently removed the Sender header from outgoing emails in favour
of
x-dkim-options, as the latter offers the ability to more easily switch
between selectors. However, following the change, users began
reporting an
increase in out-of-office re
On 18-10-01 10:48 AM, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote:
On 1 Oct 2018, at 10:16, Jonathan Leist wrote:
We recently removed the Sender header from outgoing emails in favour of
x-dkim-options, as the latter offers the ability to more easily switch
between selectors. However, following the change, u
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018, Rob McEwen wrote:
>On 10/1/2018 5:23 AM, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
>> * Require SMTP Authentication.
So much is now via stolen credentials (which your other checks try to
handle) that this does nothing to prevent, of course, but it is indeed
reasonable and responsible of you to
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:35 AM Benoit Panizzon
wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Well thank you for all the hints. I also (thanks to Al) found out, that
> you need to set the browser language to english, to get to the propper
> help page where the delisting request form can be found. With german,
> you're los
On 10/01/2018 03:00 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
We've typically recommended forwarders to not rewrite the envelope
sender when forwarding for this reason, but that was mostly pointed
at tech folks running their own servers (this page has a section for
procmail https://support.google.com/
On 18-10-01 03:52 PM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
On 10/01/2018 03:00 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
We've typically recommended forwarders to not rewrite the envelope
sender when forwarding for this reason, but that was mostly pointed at
tech folks running their own servers (this page h
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:02 PM Grant Taylor via mailop
wrote:
> On 10/01/2018 03:00 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> > We've typically recommended forwarders to not rewrite the envelope
> > sender when forwarding for this reason, but that was mostly pointed
> > at tech folks running their own
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:39 PM Michael Peddemors
wrote:
> On 18-10-01 03:52 PM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
> > On 10/01/2018 03:00 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> >> We've typically recommended forwarders to not rewrite the envelope
> >> sender when forwarding for this reason, but that w
On 18-10-01 04:48 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
Mail servers that believe SPF policies and reject messages because of it
are really kidding themselves.
This could start a whole thread on it's own..
With all respect, if someone advertises an SPF -all we SHOULD be
honouring this.. This w
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 5:09 PM Michael Peddemors
wrote:
> On 18-10-01 04:48 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> > Mail servers that believe SPF policies and reject messages because of it
> > are really kidding themselves.
> >
>
> This could start a whole thread on it's own..
>
There have been m
Here is their autogenerated messages..
Note, they explicitly set 'donotreply@' in both the From and
EnvelopeFrom, good practice.. but..
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 00:28:35 + (GMT)
From: Apple Store
To:
Message-ID:
Subject: Get even more from your new iPhone. - Profiter encore plus de votre
In article <28c04515-a3e2-94bc-9ed2-6505ee089...@linuxmagic.com> you write:
>With all respect, if someone advertises an SPF -all we SHOULD be
>honouring this.. This was the senders wishes..
Like Brandon said, if it's a plain -all meaning no mail at all, sure.
Otherwise, sorry pal, you don't get
20 matches
Mail list logo
