On 26/01/2020 1:46 PM, Ángel via mailop wrote:
On 2020-01-24 at 11:16 -0800, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
Anyways, the main reason I assume is design and space limitations as
well as the cognitive load of the UI.
Only showing it when it may be important increases the chance that
it's noticed
In article <157565.913.73.ca...@16bits.net> you write:
>The main offender here is probably Microsoft Outlook, which
>a) Seem prevalent in the corporate world
>b) Does not show the email address when reading the mail in the preview
>panel (which is the more convenient way to read the inbox, imho
On 2020-01-23 at 11:44 -0700, Raymond Burkholder via mailop wrote:
> I went to log into Youtube, and Google says my device is unknown, and
> wants to send a confirming text to a telephone number I no longer
> have.
>
> The email confirmation methods all work, and validate my account. Yet
> Googl
On 2020-01-24 at 11:16 -0800, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> Anyways, the main reason I assume is design and space limitations as
> well as the cognitive load of the UI.
>
> Only showing it when it may be important increases the chance that
> it's noticed and seen.
> Of course, we aren't always
On 2020-01-24 at 15:11 -0800, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> This was for a classroom, however, so there's a very clear mechanism
> by which an out-of-band communication can occur to look into the spam
> label and fix it... presumably also obvious by the fact that the
> person knew it went to spa
On 2020-01-24 at 11:29 -0800, Brandon Long wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:32 AM Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> Dnia 24.01.2020 o godz. 12:44:56 M. Omer GOLGELI via mailop
> pisze:
> > Google usually displays why it thinks an email is spam when
> an email marked as s
On 2020-01-24 at 16:07 +0100, Renaud Allard via mailop wrote:
> In this day and age, mailing lists have no excuse for not rewriting
> the original envelope sender to one of their own (mailop does it
> correctly).
> Forwards between uncontrolled servers are also a very bad idea for
> multiple reas
On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 07:39:30 -0500,
Johann Klasek via mailop wrote:
>
OK, that clarifies things, but since I have to connect with many
servers and they are not all up to 1.2, I will keep things as they are
for now.
Thanks.
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The questio
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 03:11:58PM -0800, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 1:27 PM Gregory Heytings via mailop <
> > > sender in addressbook is definitely a whitelisting signal, as is
> > > replying to a message the user sent or on the same thread. They used to
> > > be muc
Hi John,
fine that this is solved in some way.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 09:07:51PM -0500, John Covici via mailop wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 20:30:36 -0500,
> John Covici via mailop wrote:
[..]
> > I first want to thank everyone who has been helping me on this
> > problem. Well, I found somethin
On 2020/01/24 21:07, John Covici via mailop wrote:
> So, I have now solved the problem (sort of). On my other box, I had
> no trouble connecting to at least one of those servers and so I had to
> figure out why. So, I looked at the /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf and compared
> them on both systems and disc
11 matches
Mail list logo
