Re: [mailop] incoming rate limits

2021-04-16 Thread Vsevolod Stakhov via mailop
On 16/04/2021 13:44, micah via mailop wrote: > > It seems to be a fun past-time for some people to mailbomb users (10k > emails in minutes), to blow up a person's mailbox so they are over > quota, or to make them miss an important email. > > I'm curious what others have settled on for reasonable

[mailop] incoming rate limits

2021-04-16 Thread micah via mailop
It seems to be a fun past-time for some people to mailbomb users (10k emails in minutes), to blow up a person's mailbox so they are over quota, or to make them miss an important email. I'm curious what others have settled on for reasonable rate limits for incoming mail for individual accounts? T

Re: [mailop] DKIM+DMARC at t-online.de (Deutsche Telekom's ISP branche)

2021-04-16 Thread Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop
Hi, Tim, Jaroslaw, * the requirements posted before only apply to ESPs (email service providers | mass mailers | ... mailhosters). Mailing lists should not be concerned as far as I can tell from our stats. The case for new infrastructure is, that you'd allow us to automate detection and classif

Re: [mailop] DKIM+DMARC at t-online.de (Deutsche Telekom's ISP branche)

2021-04-16 Thread Florian.Kunkel--- via mailop
Hi Dave, *, / I represent a platform that sends mail on behalf of our customers but we maintain a separate 5321.From that points back to us. We dual-sign messages using the client domain and our own domain, but these do not align. We rely on DKIM alignment to pass a DMARC test. Example: 5321.Ma