Heh. You've never used Qpsmtpd or Haraka, I can tell. Haraka and
qpsmtpd are basically skeletons where you can insert plugins to
do/redefine anything you want pre/during/post any step of SMTP. Want to
extend/redefine SMTP? Sure. Parallelize queries to any kind of
database? Fine. Regexp subje
Hi Rob,
I'm biased as part of the Exim development team.
Exim
- is actively maintained
- has a huge user base
- provides more flexibility than other MTA I'm aware of (but, this is
*my* PoV)
> That mean Exim is the only real choice? It was a good laughing from this
> recent mailop post about E
I forgot the "selling point" that hooked me: The specification.
http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/index.html
It simply contains everything you need. But the reader has to
understand, that setup/operation of mail server can be a complex task.
As you're on *this* mailop list,
On 01.05.21 09:05, Chris via mailop wrote:
> Heh. You've never used Qpsmtpd or Haraka, I can tell. Haraka and
Nope. Didn't have to. That's why I was curious about use cases that were
not possible with the more common MTAs.
> qpsmtpd are basically skeletons where you can insert plugins to
> do
> I used Postfix along time but my experience is that it is incredible
> difficult to implement custom logic especially across the different
> binaries/processes it uses to fulfil a mail delivery transaction. Its
> designed in the "unix philosophy" and has good performance - great but
> Postfi
If you're a small-scale sender, this is just the way it goes with Outlook.com - SNDS doesn't do anything except provide
you %s, and because the number of emails from small-scale senders is so low (and the "customers" here don't even pay for
the service), Microsoft isn't incentivized to fix the is
I can only agree. Using Outlook means check your junk for important mail and
find a lot of trash in your inbox.
We have moved countless new customers away from Outlook because of this issue.
I don't know why they don't care. Really.
> Am 01.05.2021 um 18:55 schrieb Matt Corallo via mailop :
>
It appears that Chris via mailop said:
>There's a third called "mailfront" that uses plugin C
>modules. I know almost nothing more about it, other than its similar in
>intent/architecture. I think the community surrounding it is even smaller.
>
>Still running it John?
Yup, works great. It's wr
It appears that Chris via mailop said:
>There's a third called "mailfront" that uses plugin C
>modules. I know almost nothing more about it, other than its similar in
>intent/architecture. I think the community surrounding it is even smaller.
>
>Still running it John?
Yup, works great. It's wr
Hi!
(I'm new here, so if I'm doing mistakes, do not hesitate to tell me with
MP, or public, I'd like to respect the community)
We are a small provider based in France ( https://indiehosters.net ) and
we have all in place (DMARC, DKIM, PTR, SNDS, JMRP, and a really strict SPF)
Since a year,
On 01/05/2021 10:09, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
>
>
> On 01.05.21 09:05, Chris via mailop wrote:
>> Heh. You've never used Qpsmtpd or Haraka, I can tell. Haraka and
>
> Nope. Didn't have to. That's why I was curious about use cases that were
> not possible with the more common MTAs.
>
>>
The fact that filling out their support ticket does nothing except generate
canned responses and that you have to come here to Mailops to get any
movement on a blocked IP address or blocked server - you would think that
that would tell Microsoft something about how ineffective their support
ticket
As far as I can tell, there's nothing you can do. You can try a non-Hetzner IP, sure, but plenty of people on here (like
me!) have a dedicated IP in their own IP space for sending mail and still go straight to Hotmail-Junk.
Rate limiting might help, but if you send too *few* mails Microsoft's wa
13 matches
Mail list logo