Re: [mailop] What a drag it is sending DMARC reports

2021-12-29 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Tue 28/Dec/2021 12:11:15 +0100 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote: Am 28.12.21 um 11:08 schrieb Alessandro Vesely via mailop: Yeah, we inevitably fall back to IP address lists.  Perhaps not so much because it's easier to outline a perimeter using numbers than names, but because it's rathe

Re: [mailop] Roundcube client IPs → dovecot, postfix

2021-12-29 Thread Noel Butler via mailop
On 29/12/2021 14:15, Mark Foster via mailop wrote: So your attitude is fine if you're a _good_ platform operator _and the victim _ Most operators will be better operators, as most of us dont have tools scanning its users emails to target advertising and christ knows what else they do with th

Re: [mailop] Roundcube client IPs → dovecot, postfix

2021-12-29 Thread Noel Butler via mailop
On 29/12/2021 14:15, Mark Foster via mailop wrote: I use Roundcube myself and as a _user_ of the software, it hadn't occurred to me that, much like Gmail, people who send emails using this webmail tool have _full anonymity_ (except, of course, from the service operator). Should have included

Re: [mailop] Roundcube client IPs → dovecot, postfix

2021-12-29 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
Dnia 29.12.2021 o godz. 20:48:25 Noel Butler via mailop pisze: > >I for one look forward to Roundcube building in the option to have > >the web IP included in headers, > > Mark, you do realise, that information *is already there* in the > header, well, for network operators it is, as its encrypted

Re: [mailop] Roundcube client IPs → dovecot, postfix

2021-12-29 Thread Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop
Am 29.12.21 um 13:32 schrieb Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop: As far as I know, Gmail puts the originating IP of the client (browser) connecting via HTTP into the first "Received" header, as plain text. No, they don't. As a spamfighter, I'd wish they did, but I do understand the related privacy conc

Re: [mailop] Walled gardens

2021-12-29 Thread yuv via mailop
On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 21:59 -0500, John Levine via mailop wrote: > It appears that yuv via mailop said: > > The first thing to make internet email viable for the future is to > > establish a defensible perimeter and keep bad actors out. Easier > > said > > than done. ... > > Unfortunately, e-mai

Re: [mailop] What a drag it is sending DMARC reports

2021-12-29 Thread yuv via mailop
On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 15:27 +0100, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote: > Am 28.12.21 um 14:31 schrieb yuv via mailop: > > > > The problem is behavioral, not technological. More technology is > > not the solution. > > I'm a software developer, not a lawyer. And as you certainly know, if > the on

[mailop] Privacy is Propery, not Confidentiality (was: Roundcube client IPs → dovecot, postfix)

2021-12-29 Thread yuv via mailop
On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 07:17 -0800, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote: > The world has gone far too anal in it's approach to privacy, at the > expense of security, IMHO. The "world" does not understand privacy. Most of the experts who understand are hired by the entities who stand to lose if the

[mailop] PII is a diversion from Privacy (was: Roundcube client IPs → dovecot, postfix)

2021-12-29 Thread yuv via mailop
On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 12:19 -0600, Richard W via mailop wrote: > Those that advocate IP addresses are PII still drive around with a > license plate on their car. That's even more PII out in the open as > that is a static IP. Those that advocate what is PII and what is not are diverting from wha

[mailop] Barriers to Entry / Governance (was: What a drag it is sending DMARC reports)

2021-12-29 Thread yuv via mailop
On Thu, 2021-12-23 at 21:02 -0700, Dave Warren via mailop wrote: > On 2021-12-18 08:39, yuv via mailop wrote: > > On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 15:13 +0100, Alexey Shpakovsky via mailop > > wrote: > > > On Sat, December 18, 2021 13:50, yuv via mailop wrote: > > > > What makes the difference between [the sm

Re: [mailop] Walled gardens

2021-12-29 Thread Dave Crocker via mailop
On 12/29/2021 4:40 AM, yuv via mailop wrote: Unfortunately, e-mail walled gardens are a Well Known Bad Idea. RFCs-based e-mail is a walled garden. We lawyers call this the Rule of Law. That's very creative. Not what is normally meant, and not even slightly useful. But very creative. We

Re: [mailop] Roundcube client IPs → dovecot, postfix

2021-12-29 Thread Mark Foster via mailop
On 29/12/2021 11:48 pm, Noel Butler via mailop wrote: abuse reports filed with them... there's little evidence of this to an end-user/victim...) I for one look forward to Roundcube building in the option to have the web IP included in headers, Mark, you do realise, that information *is alre

Re: [mailop] Roundcube client IPs → dovecot, postfix

2021-12-29 Thread Mark Foster via mailop
On 29/12/2021 11:58 pm, Noel Butler via mailop wrote: On 29/12/2021 14:15, Mark Foster via mailop wrote: I use Roundcube myself and as a /user/ of the software, it hadn't occurred to me that, much like Gmail, people who send emails using this webmail tool have /full anonymity/ (except, of

Re: [mailop] Roundcube client IPs → dovecot, postfix

2021-12-29 Thread John Levine via mailop
It appears that Mark Foster via mailop said: >Maybe I need to be clear that I both use Roundcube, and operate it on a >private MTA. I havn't seen how my HTTP(S) IP address was encoded in any >emails i've sent using Roundcube, even as the operator of that platform. > >Perhaps I missed something.