Thanks to everyone who submitted an abuse report for this so far. Our Trust &
Safety team is aware of an uptick of spam reports associated with wewe.global
domains. We’re investigating each report we receive, so please keep them coming.
- Jim
--
Director of Customer Support Operations | Linod
Hi,
for relative long time (some weeks) i have troubles with SORBS RBL. I do
not use it at MTA nor rspamd level, but only in my script, which i run
only manually when i need to inspect some IP status in depth, thus i
cannot exceed any limits.
But queries to SORBS (concrete to safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> I collect related NS records and try to ping them from another IP
> (different ISP), to be sure that they are not blocked by me nor by my
> ISP, and results corresponds with my experiences:
>
>ns0.sorbs.net. 113.52.8.11 ping fail
>ns2.sorbs.net. 87.106.246.125 ping fail
>ns4.sorbs.ne
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:54:00 +0100, Slavko via mailop
wrote:
>Please, encounter someone else this? Are here some problems on their
>side?
They frequently fail the timeout setting on a DNSBL checker tool I use.
Running the tool again pulls the records in cache that arrived after the
timeout. The
Ahoj,
Dňa Fri, 11 Mar 2022 13:41:27 -0600 Michael Rathbun via mailop
napísal:
> They frequently fail the timeout setting on a DNSBL checker tool I
> use. Running the tool again pulls the records in cache that arrived
> after the timeout. The resolver is a local instance of bind.
I use local
Ahoj,
Dňa Fri, 11 Mar 2022 11:20:24 -0800 Dan Mahoney via mailop
napísal:
> Why are you instead not doing a dig against these ips? It's clear
> you understand that ICMP may be blocked, so why not use a check
> method that actually uses the protocol you'd use to query them?
(send only to Dan ac
Firslty yes, seen too many issues with SORBS, we removed them about 3
weeks ago, the problems have been ongoing for months.
Secondly, like most DNSBL's they probably use rbldnsd, this does not
support TCP, only UDP
On 12/03/2022 06:17, Slavko via mailop wrote:
Ahoj,
Dňa Fri, 11 Mar 2022 11
On 11 Mar 2022, at 19:09, Noel Butler via mailop wrote:
> Firslty yes, seen too many issues with SORBS, we removed them about 3 weeks
> ago, the problems have been ongoing for months.
Just wrapping up a trial with them for a traffic sample. We saw no issues in
processing north of 300 million me
On 2022-03-10 at 15:28 -0500, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> If you really want to stop mail loops, use a Delivered-To header like
> qmail, Postfix, and Courier do:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-duklev-deliveredto/
You still need to stop at *some* hop-count. This approach stops
deli
According to à ngel via mailop :
>On 2022-03-10 at 15:28 -0500, John Levine via mailop wrote:
>> If you really want to stop mail loops, use a Delivered-To header like
>> qmail, Postfix, and Courier do:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-duklev-deliveredto/
>
>You still need to stop at *s
10 matches
Mail list logo
