On 7/13/2022, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows:
<[elided]@gmail.com>: host
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4004:c17::1a] said: 550-5.7.1
[2610:1c1:1:606c::19:2] Our system has detected that this messa
Here it is blocked/trapped/tagged as well ;) And probably many other
places and reputation lists, but for those that aren't ..
Well, it seemed prudent..
Now, if they stop with the bot generated removal requests ;)
On 2022-07-13 14:11, Mary via mailop wrote:
[ban] Country..: US
[ban] ISP
[ban] Country..: US
[ban] ISP..: HostWinds LLC
[ban] IPv4.: 142.11.213.0/24
[ban] Warning..: ALREADY_BANNED: 142.11.213.0/24
in permanent ban :)
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 13:02:59 -0700 Michael Peddemors via mailop
wrote:
> More bad actors at HostWinds..
>
> 142.11.213.163x132
More bad actors at HostWinds..
142.11.213.163 x132payments-citi.com
142.11.213.175 x115rdns0.activepaypnc.com
142.11.213.201 x134rdns0.wellsfargo-remittances.com
I let someone else report these ones..
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
--
As far as the rfc ignorant rejections, the rules about some duplicate
headers have been ramping for a couple months, but only recently was the
error message updated to point out what the issue is, before it was a more
generic might be spam message.
This is in addition to the rules we've had for ye
It appears that Chris Adams via mailop said:
>Once upon a time, John Levine said:
>> Same here. I set up a kludge to rewrite From: headers several years
>> ago (not rewriting to the list address, which sucks) and it still
>> works fine.
>
>Is there a standard for doing rewrites like that?
No, be
Once upon a time, John Levine said:
> Same here. I set up a kludge to rewrite From: headers several years
> ago (not rewriting to the list address, which sucks) and it still
> works fine.
Is there a standard for doing rewrites like that? Because I like to see
actual senders in the From: line (wh
It appears that Al Iverson via mailop said:
>Yeah, I'm not seeing Google be "hostile" to mailing lists if the mail
>fully authenticates properly. I've felt mailing lists and
>authentication and Gmail were a solved problem, at least from my
>perspective, for a number of years now.
Same here. I set
Mark Fletcher via mailop wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 8:29 AM Miles Fidelman via mailop
mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:
It's been over a month now, since Google became hostile to email
lists.
I'm still dealing with the aftermath.
How so? We haven't seen any issues.
Mark
_
Yeah, I'm not seeing Google be "hostile" to mailing lists if the mail
fully authenticates properly. I've felt mailing lists and
authentication and Gmail were a solved problem, at least from my
perspective, for a number of years now.
What bit me recently was a bug, not some pushback against my busin
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 8:29 AM Miles Fidelman via mailop
wrote:
> It's been over a month now, since Google became hostile to email lists.
> I'm still dealing with the aftermath.
>
> How so? We haven't seen any issues.
Mark
___
mailop mailing list
mail
On 7/13/2022 11:18 AM, Miles Fidelman via mailop wrote:
It's been over a month now, since Google became hostile to email
lists. I'm still dealing with the aftermath.
Do you mean their stricter requirements around SPF and DKIM?
___
mailop mailing list
It's been over a month now, since Google became hostile to email lists.
I'm still dealing with the aftermath.
Miles Fidelman
Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows:
<[elided]@gmail.com>: host
gmail-smtp-in.l.googl
I've gotten bitten by this too, as I had my homebrew mailing list
manager intermittently generating messages with two message ID headers
-- but not in the past few days -- more like a couple of months ago.
So it could be new-ish, I guess.
Cheers,
Al
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 5:34 AM Philip Paeps vi
On 2022-07-13 at 05:52:33 UTC-0400 (Wed, 13 Jul 2022 10:52:33 +0100)
Laura Atkins via mailop
is rumored to have said:
[...]
There are currently quite a number of anecdotal reports that Google is
moving towards rejecting more email that doesn’t comply with their
interpretation of the standards
Hi Romain,
thanks for the link. VadeSecure was able to solve the problem with a
modification of their rulesets.
Regards,
Carlo
Von: Romain
Datum: Dienstag, 12. Juli 2022 um 14:11
An: Carlo Frietschy
Cc: "mailop@mailop.org"
Betreff: [EXTERN] Re: [mailop] Trouble sending mail to French provide
On 2022-07-13 17:52:33 (+0800), Laura Atkins wrote:
On 13 Jul 2022, at 09:07, Philip Paeps via mailop
wrote:
On 2022-07-13 15:31:17 (+0800), Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from
Gmail as follows: [...]
As far as I can tell, the messa
> On 13 Jul 2022, at 09:07, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
>
> On 2022-07-13 15:31:17 (+0800), Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
>> In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail as
>> follows: [...]
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the message is compliant. It doesn't have a
W dniu 2022-07-13 o 09:31, Philip Paeps via mailop pisze:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows:
<[elided]@gmail.com>: host
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4004:c17::1a] said: 550-5.7.1
[2610:1c1:1:606c::19:2] Our system has detected
On 2022-07-13 15:31:17 (+0800), Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows: [...]
As far as I can tell, the message is compliant. It doesn't have any
of the obvious problems, at least. From, To, Message-ID and Date are
su
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the message is compliant. It doesn't have any of the
Can you post it so others can check?
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
In the past couple of days, I'm seeing an uptick in rejects from Gmail
as follows:
<[elided]@gmail.com>: host
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:4004:c17::1a] said: 550-5.7.1
[2610:1c1:1:606c::19:2] Our system has detected that this message
is
550-5.7.1 not RFC 5322 compliant. To
22 matches
Mail list logo