My system is getting spammed by outbound.protection.outlook.com
mail=
rcpt=, stat=550
rcpt=, stat=550
and this happens again and again.
(note: it happened before with other MAIL addresses)
It their MTA broken -- ignoring 550 for RCPT?
Or is the sender submitting the mail again and again?
the lat
ra...@usebouncer.com said:
> - marketing teams coming to us from Marketing SaaSs, who, during customer
> onboarding, notice that the quality of email lists is low and send their
> customers to us to clean it first.
My alarm bells went off on one of your first messages when you said little
guys
Hello Slavko,
>
>
>
> I do not understand one thing. Why do you think, that you can use my (or
> any other's) hardware for own business without approve?
>
>
>
I don't think that.
Honestly, I hate that we are using YOUR resources without compensating you.
As I wrote before, I'd love to pay.
Dňa 6. septembra 2022 20:39:04 UTC používateľ Radek Kaczynski via mailop
napísal:
>And as always, I really appreciate and respect your perspective and
>constructive exchange of thoughts.
>This conversation has stimulated me to reflect on our current and potentially
>future business model.
I d
Hi Hal, Members
Interestingly, because we initially were API only, back-end as a service, the
most significant portion of our revenue comes from:
- Marketing SaaSs - that want to protect their infrastructure from organic but
low-quality databases; and here low quality usually comes from old dat
Hello Atro,
>
> Having said all of the above, I truly welcome the fact that you have shown
> up here to own up and explain what it is that you are doing and where you
> are coming from with this. It may not make matters any better from the
> perspective of whether anybody's inclined to accept ema
On 5 Sep 2022, at 18:07, Atro Tossavainen via mailop wrote:
>> This is a bit less clear, but I'd say that is fine because you have
>> every reason to believe that you are acting on behalf of the address
>> owner, not some 3rd party who may not have acquired the address
>> legitimately.
>
> This, t
Hi all
Bearing in mind that Radek has somewhat stuck his head above an apparent
parapet in participating here, I’d just like to remind you all to:
1. Be kind, even if you’re being critical
2. For everyone’s sake, keep the thread on topic.
There is a real, identifiable, problematic issue at hand
Dnia 5.09.2022 o godz. 15:58:51 Jay Hennigan via mailop pisze:
> > Of course, if you want that other person receive all information about
> > the progress and results of your application, and you have no access to
> > that information (unless you personally come to the office to ask about it),
> >
Radek Kaczynski said:
> That's interesting indeed - we haven't implemented SMTP VRFY as it is very
> uncommon.
> However, I truly think that it would be great to use VRFY instead of "broken
> SMTP trick".
> I would be more than happy to pay to use it - or give back to the community
> or charity.
10 matches
Mail list logo
