On 10/18/22 8:28 AM, WIlliam Fisher via mailop wrote:
I'm pretty sure DKIM wouldn't include the non-standard threading
headers.
/Default/ DKIM configurations probably don't include the threading
header(s) (References & In-Reply-To). But it's certainly possible that
they are included.
That
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:43 PM Grant Taylor via mailop
wrote:
> On 10/17/22 10:17 PM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
> > Right, but you can't stick a non-compliant message into a DSN
> > directly and have that be a compliant message... so you either make
> > the non-compliant message compliant
Strange last couple of days.. with renewed activity of old techniques.
Keeping it to point form this time:
* SendGrid still having problems, increased detection again
(Love this spam, From: Department of Defence )
* IPXO got a new /16 in September, and already being leased to spammers
Org
Thanks to Al for his (as usual!) useful thoughts.
I was cheekily wondering whether the original authors of the BATV Internet
Draft, John Levine, Dave Crocker and Tony Finch (I don't think Tony is
subscribed to mailop), might have any views on the probity of its use in
today's times.
This question
I've seen these headers as well. They were coming out of one
particular "groups" mail system, likely added as an artifact of that
process.
The super long headers can also cause some clients to just not display
the messages.
I'm pretty sure DKIM wouldn't include the non-standard threading
hea
These hosts deliver newsletters and marketing content that Apple sends to email
addresses that are Apple IDs.
I will let the team in question know to fix their PTR for these hosts – thanks
for the heads up
--srs
From: mailop on behalf of Alexander Huynh via
mailop
Date: Tuesday, 18 October
