Re: [mailop] Recommendations for host with good IP reputation or use external SMTP?

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, 7:33 PM John Levine via mailop, wrote: > It appears that Grant Taylor via mailop said: > >-=-=-=-=-=- > >-=-=-=-=-=- > > > >On 10/30/22 5:35 PM, Ian Evans via mailop wrote: > >> DO admits their IP reputation sucks and so won't intervene with > >> vadesecure on behalf of my

Re: [mailop] Recommendations for host with good IP reputation or use external SMTP?

It appears that Grant Taylor via mailop said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On 10/30/22 5:35 PM, Ian Evans via mailop wrote: >> DO admits their IP reputation sucks and so won't intervene with >> vadesecure on behalf of my IP. > >I'm surprised and disappointed that Digital Ocean won't do anything t

Re: [mailop] SPFBL - was Re: Recommendations for host with good IP reputation or use external SMTP?

On 10/31/22 11:39 AM, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote: If it is useful isn't three bucks small enough for the spammers to pay too ? My understanding is that spammers are trying to be as cheap as possible. Considering that the price per listing of each IP is 60% of the price of the smalles

Re: [mailop] Recommendations for host with good IP reputation or use external SMTP?

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, 1:32 PM Grant Taylor via mailop, wrote: > On 10/30/22 5:35 PM, Ian Evans via mailop wrote: > > DO admits their IP reputation sucks and so won't intervene with > > vadesecure on behalf of my IP. > > I'm surprised and disappointed that Digital Ocean won't do anything to > vouc

[mailop] SPFBL - was Re: Recommendations for host with good IP reputation or use external SMTP?

On Mon, 31 Oct 2022, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote: Aside: Check out SPFBL's allow list service. I spent the one-time $3 per IP to list my two VPSs. I consider the price low enough that it's reasonable for me as an individual to be able to do. Read: It's within my reach. I don't like th

Re: [mailop] Recommendations for host with good IP reputation or use external SMTP?

On 10/30/22 5:35 PM, Ian Evans via mailop wrote: DO admits their IP reputation sucks and so won't intervene with vadesecure on behalf of my IP. I'm surprised and disappointed that Digital Ocean won't do anything to vouch for "yes, this customer is using this IP, and has been for $TIME". I'm

Re: [mailop] Calix 844 Router Compromise

It's about time that Calix has admitted to the vulnerability.. Reported this already some time back. On 2022-10-29 11:09, Kenneth Vedder via mailop wrote: Hi All, We had some of our Calix 844G routers compromised by a SOCKS5 vulnerability this weekend. They were sending out spam. Calix is awar

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] Recommendations for host with good IP reputation or use external SMTP?

This is why you should insist your hosting provider offer you 'rwhois' for your IP, so that VadSecure and others can see that you operate the IP, when you started using it, etc, and you will find that they may be much more inclined to believe you. And any hosting company that isn't willing to

Re: [mailop] [E] Re: Only Yahoo deferring mail

Hey Nate- I will reply off list. thanks! *Lili Crowley* she/her Postmaster On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 5:08 PM Nate Burke via mailop wrote: > Thanks for the link. Server has been on this same IP Address for at > least 15 years. I've opened a ticket yesterday with