Re: [mailop] Spam received from ips with forged reverse names

2023-01-05 Thread Alexander Huynh via mailop
On Jan 5, 2023, at 14:54, Serizy via mailop wrote: but what worries me is that, the PTR resolves to the fake hostname, but the host name doesn’t resolve to the ip, logically…and the messages go to the user mailbox in Outlook.com This should not be an issue if the MTA performs both forward (A/A

[mailop] verizon email-to-text gateway mail deferred evening and night

2023-01-05 Thread Zube via mailop
This is new as the past few days and rather odd. Mail sent through the Verizon email-to-text gateway is fine during the day when the relay is: relay=vrz-mms.mx.a.cloudfilter.net. [52.37.233.84] or relay=vrz-mms.mx.a.cloudfilter.net. [35.169.108.175] but starting somewhere around 5pm MST, mail

[mailop] Spam received from ips with forged reverse names

2023-01-05 Thread Serizy via mailop
Hello. I would like to report here a spam source that is sending messages to some of our users. Interestingly this source is using forged reverse names for their ips, and they are using many different ips in what seems a snowshoe pattern. The domains used for their reverse names, PTR records, a