On 2023-01-09 02:21:15 (+0800), Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2023, John Levine via mailop wrote:
But more to the point, why do you care? The number of phones these
days that can get SMS but not email rounds to zero, so if someone
wants to send you mail, they can send you
It appears that � ngel via mailop said:
>On 2023-01-08 at 18:21 +, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
>> Once upon a time SMS had a reputation for stronger security and
>> privacy than email. I don't know how much that reputation was
>> or is deserved.
>
>Well, a SMS:
>- Is not encrypted at
On 2023-01-08 at 18:21 +, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> Once upon a time SMS had a reputation for stronger security and
> privacy than email. I don't know how much that reputation was
> or is deserved.
Well, a SMS:
- Is not encrypted at any point
- Could be dropped with no
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2023, John Levine via mailop wrote:
But more to the point, why do you care? The number of phones these
days that can get SMS but not email rounds to zero, so if someone
wants to send you mail, they can send you mail and
On Sun, 7 Jan 2023, John Levine via mailop wrote:
But more to the point, why do you care? The number of phones these
days that can get SMS but not email rounds to zero, so if someone
wants to send you mail, they can send you mail and don't need to fool
around with a flaky gateway.
At least
Brandon Applegate via mailop skrev den 2023-01-06 22:16:
I’ve just hit this recently too. There are a bunch of threads on the
official VZW forums. Of course with all due respect to the VZW
employees that actually try and reply in there - they have 0 clue what
this even is…
oh dear, lets
