On 2023-05-26 at 13:16 -0500, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
> If you ask me - a better solution would be to do away with forwarding
> completely and incorporate POP checks, like Gmail does. This
> alleviates all of the issues with forwarding mail in relation to SPF
> and DKIM.
>
> But I know
Dnia 27.05.2023 o godz. 13:43:08 John Levine via mailop pisze:
> Dan Bernstein, who wrote qmail when he probably should have been thinking
> about
> cryptography, had an idea for a reworked mail system along these lines:
>
> https://cr.yp.to/im2000.html
>
> You can tell from its name how long
It appears that Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop said:
>With that way of thinking, you can get rid of email completely, and just
>regularly check some website where people can write messages for you...
Dan Bernstein, who wrote qmail when he probably should have been thinking about
cryptography, had an
Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop writes:
> Dnia 26.05.2023 o godz. 13:16:39 Scott Mutter via mailop pisze:
>> If you ask me - a better solution would be to do away with forwarding
>> completely and incorporate POP checks, like Gmail does. This alleviates
>> all of the issues with forwarding mail in
Dnia 26.05.2023 o godz. 13:16:39 Scott Mutter via mailop pisze:
> If you ask me - a better solution would be to do away with forwarding
> completely and incorporate POP checks, like Gmail does. This alleviates
> all of the issues with forwarding mail in relation to SPF and DKIM.
No, because you
On Fri, 26 May 2023, Scott Mutter via mailop wrote:
If you ask me - a better solution would be to do away with forwarding
completely and incorporate POP checks, like Gmail does. This alleviates
all of the issues with forwarding mail in relation to SPF and DKIM.
What happens when I send a
