Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-19 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Sun 19/Nov/2023 00:15:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote: On 2023-11-18 18:59:53 (+0800), Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: On Fri 17/Nov/2023 15:37:58 +0100 Philip Paeps via mailop wrote: We do all the things in the Bulk Sender Guidelines (except DMARC because we don't want to frustra

Re: [mailop] Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-19 Thread Bill Cole via mailop
On 2023-11-19 at 06:59:37 UTC-0500 (Sun, 19 Nov 2023 12:59:37 +0100) Alessandro Vesely via mailop is rumored to have said: I don't think someone can drop almost all mail and still call itself a mail server. Were you running a mail system in the early-mid 2000s? At that time, I tracked the pe

[mailop] Historical spam loads - was Re: Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-19 Thread Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023, Bill Cole via mailop wrote: On 2023-11-19 at 06:59:37 UTC-0500 (Sun, 19 Nov 2023 12:59:37 +0100) Alessandro Vesely via mailop is rumored to have said: I don't think someone can drop almost all mail and still call itself a mail server. Were you running a mail system in t

Re: [mailop] Historical spam loads - was Re: Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-19 Thread Bill Cole via mailop
On 2023-11-19 at 14:02:04 UTC-0500 (Sun, 19 Nov 2023 19:02:04 + (GMT)) Andrew C Aitchison via mailop is rumored to have said: On Sun, 19 Nov 2023, Bill Cole via mailop wrote: On 2023-11-19 at 06:59:37 UTC-0500 (Sun, 19 Nov 2023 12:59:37 +0100) Alessandro Vesely via mailop is rumored to

Re: [mailop] Historical spam loads - was Re: Google rate-limiting more aggressively than usual?

2023-11-19 Thread Michael Rathbun via mailop
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 19:02:04 + (GMT), Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote: >That is a surprise to hear. Reading this list has given me the impression >that the spam volume is worse now than it was then. Spamming is a much bigger >business now and the internet is faster, so I would have though