On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:33:21 -0800, Robert L Mathews via mailop
wrote:
>Interesting, thanks. I find I disagree with the "full stop" part, but it seems
>I'm in the minority.
Perhaps. I take Google for an example. Fossicking through the logs here, I
find...
>> cidrsearch *all /nonu
Dňa 16. februára 2024 21:03:18 UTC používateľ Marco Moock via mailop
napísal:
>Use the VRFY SMTP command for that. If the remote site doesn't provide
>it, they don't want that somebody probes for the mailboxes.
IMO only between own servers, if at all. Disabling it (for public access)
is
It appears that Robert L Mathews via mailop said:
>On Feb 15, 2024, at 6:13 PM, Dave Crocker via mailop wrote:
>
>> Not using COI, as well as hitting spamtraps are both solid, affirmative
>> indications of spam. Full stop.
>
>Interesting, thanks. I find I disagree with the "full stop" part, but
On 2024-02-16 at 15:49:12 UTC-0500 (Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:49:12 -0600)
Jesse Hathaway via mailop
is rumored to have said:
What is this current attitude on using something like
Postfix's `reject_unverified_recipient`?
ONLY use this when you are relaying for specific domains that you
service
Am Fri, 16 Feb 2024 14:49:12 -0600
schrieb Jesse Hathaway via mailop :
> Does probing for recipients work these days, is it considered abusive?
Use the VRFY SMTP command for that. If the remote site doesn't provide
it, they don't want that somebody probes for the mailboxes.
Some dnsbl (e.g.
> On 15.02.2024 at 03:55 Philip Paeps wrote:
>
> On 2024-02-15 02:51:17 (+0800), Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
>>> On 13.02.2024 at 17:05 John Levine via mailop wrote:
>>> More to the point, whether it's DKIM nor S/MIME or PGP, bad guys can
>>> and do sign their mail, too.
>> True, however I
Dňa 16. februára 2024 19:42:08 UTC používateľ Andrew C Aitchison via mailop
napísal:
>AMAZON
> https://docs.aws.amazon.com/general/latest/gr/aws-ip-ranges.html
> https://ip-ranges.amazonaws.com/ip-ranges.json
Please, is somewhere described what "service" values means in it?
regards
--
What is this current attitude on using something like
Postfix's `reject_unverified_recipient`?
Does probing for recipients work these days, is it considered abusive?
Yours kindly, Jesse Hathaway
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
On Feb 15, 2024, at 6:13 PM, Dave Crocker via mailop wrote:
> Not using COI, as well as hitting spamtraps are both solid, affirmative
> indications of spam. Full stop.
Interesting, thanks. I find I disagree with the "full stop" part, but it seems
I'm in the minority.
Don't get me wrong --
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Matt Palmer via mailop wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 07:57:09AM +0100, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
Is there some way to identify the host IPs which are
used by those cloud servers, so one could block incoming SMTP from them if
Microsoft can't be bothered to
Am 16.02.24 um 03:37 schrieb Matt Palmer via mailop:
Although I must say that
without reverse DNS
would seem to be the easier blocking option -- when was the last time you
saw legitimate mail from an IP without rDNS?
- Matt
We do that, with some exceptions, as we indeed get some legitimate
11 matches
Mail list logo