Re: [mailop] Google not sending DMARC reports since 9/25

We're seeing the same thing for all of DMARC Digests. Things dropped off around Sept 26th. On Tue, Oct 3, 2023, at 7:51 AM, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2023, Faisal Misle via mailop wrote: > > > We noticed (and looks like so did our counterparts at Dmarcian) that > > Go

Re: [mailop] Netflix no incoming for one user

com/ses/latest/DeveloperGuide/sending-email-global-suppression-list.html> -- especially if at some point a complaint was registered for that recipient. You and the recipient likely won't know the address is being suppressed because it's done on the sender's side. -- Anna Ward Postm

Re: [mailop] Microsoft 2.6.0 ... 2.1.5

-level is still susceptible to individual domain admin policy. Anyone notice something different? -- Anna Ward Postmarkapp.com On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 2:33 PM Alexander Burch wrote: > A typical Microsoft successfully delivery looks like this at the moment: > > *250 2.6.0* <201253301423

[mailop] Google Postmaster Tools: spam rates

the Spam Rate ("user reported") would be at only 0.1%. How are such drastic differences possible? Thanks for any insight! -- Anna Ward <http://linkedin.com/in/annagraceward> ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Dealing with a DKIM replay attack and yahoo's use of DKIM domains for FBL reports

Laura Atkins has some pretty cool ideas here: https://wordtothewise.com/2014/05/dkim-injected-headers/ I'd be interested to see if including those headers twice in the signature works, so an altered or second instance of them would fail DKIM. And have you had success including the t= and/or an agg