Re: [mailop] Help with icloud

Hi, Yea, nobody responds to messages sent to icloudad...@apple.com that's not what I said. We got a reply within 24 hours telling us the domain in question was getting DMARC permerrors. Regards Bjoern ___ mailop mai

Re: [mailop] Help with icloud

Am 26.09.24 um 04:19 schrieb Francisco via mailop: Thanks. We did that, but its radio silence since the 12th :( What error message did you get? At $dayjob I got a "blocked by local policy" for a domain from icloud and the DKIM entry was broken which resulted in a DMARC permerror for the do

Re: [mailop] [E] Anyone from sbcglobal.net

Hi, But I sent a test message to his intended recipient and my test message was received. Our DNS has been "as is" for a very long time and we're not getting any rDNS errors from any others. but you have 2 PTR set for that IP: host 66.171.0.45 45.0.171.66.in-addr.arpa domain name point

Re: [mailop] Mailserver accepts ssl/tls only

Am 18.07.24 um 15:47 schrieb Scott Q. via mailop: This user doesn't really want to do anything I suspect. Instead of high quality technical/policy posts, this list is consumed with personal questions that provide little general value, by this one individual. Not only this list, unfortunately

Re: [mailop] Mailserver software

Hi, use case: I understand the benefit of iPhone (and Android) email client storing the access credentials on Apple's (or Google) server so that the server polls IMAP and only wakes up the phone if there is actual mail to be fetched. However, this grants the server more access than it needs t

Re: [mailop] Mailserver software

Hi, The new players (5,6,7,8) seem to support well on modern email standard (DKIM, SPF, DMARC, DANE, MTA-STS). Anyone is using those new systems? I only tested stalwart, and it performed badly. Reagrds ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org ht

Re: [mailop] Mailserver software

Am 15.07.24 um 21:33 schrieb Marco Davids (SIDN) via mailop: Op 15-07-2024 om 16:39 schreef Jeff Pang via mailop: When I deploy a new mailserver, I consider postfix, exim and qmail. Why not try something completely different, like https://www.xmox.nl/ ? It installs in minutes (literally) and

Re: [mailop] Cloud hosts for responsible mail servers?

Hi, Gone are the days when you could just throw a Linux box up in a colo and expect to get your mail delivered. You can easily become the unwitting victim of being in a bad IP neighborhood through no fault of your own. Although this advice is painful, I recommend using a service for final d

Re: [mailop] Microsoft SNDS website not working

Hi, Keep hitting refresh, it will eventually load (at least it does for me).  But I believe this is indicative of some problems on the backend of this website and maybe of the entire Microsoft postmaster/SNDS/JMRPP system.  It's been quite literally months since I've received anything from

Re: [mailop] Microsoft SNDS website not working

Hi, https://sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/snds/index.aspx Is resulting in a lot of failed page loads, a lot of having to refresh, authorization emails seemingly not being sent. Anyone else having issues with Mic

Re: [mailop] [spamhaus] de-listing requests successful, but only for a couple of days.

Hi, As this is a hobby project of mine, and I am not willing to increase my expenses significantly, I have re-configured both mailservers of mine to use IPv4 addresses for outgoing mails, only. No big deal, and I can live with that. there are other providers in the same price range which ass

Re: [mailop] Office365: only accepts messages from people in its organization or on its allowed senders list

Hi, As the list is restricted, that’s pretty poor business practice - “We expect you to reply to this message, but you can’t, and here’s why!” especially stupid if such an address is used for DMARC reports. Regards Bjoern ___ mailop mailing list m

Re: [mailop] zen.spamhaus.org

Hi, Hmm. How do I check that? Running nslookup defaults to my local resolver instance. you can run host whoami.akamai.net which responds with IP of the used resolver. Regards Bjoern ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.

Re: [mailop] Microsoft rejecting their own headers

Hi, What is stupid is that the header that causes the reject upon reinject is written BY THEM! How about not writing such crazily long report on a single header? They have to protect their users from spam, but their users themselves would never spam. So this makes sense. SCNR Bjoern __

[mailop] Microsoft's outlook mitigation again

Hi, some days ago I moved my private box from Hetzner to Clouvider. Seemed like a clean IP (according to Hetrixtools etc), even T-Online unblocked it without issues, but after accessing Microsofts SDNS a hassle began: * Mails are considered as Junk due to user complains * I created a ticket an

Re: [mailop] Gmail deferrals resolved by transit encryption

Hi, Failed rr=Site gmail.com (2607:f8b0:4001:c5a::1a) said after data sent: 550 5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/?p=NotAuthorizedError 75-20020a6b144e00b007a2a17ef77bsi3551757iou.146 - gsmtp 550-5.7.1 [2607:fe28:0:4000::10] The IP you're using to send mail is not\n550-5.7.1 author

Re: [mailop] Microsoft lays hands on login data: Beware of the new Outlook

Hi, Like to hear more about this, even if you choose to do it off list. We all know how bad the Contabo IP space can be, but it would be interesting to know if the COntabo IP used recently updated credentials, eg just before you used BlueMail. Otherwise it might be some other form of compromis

Re: [mailop] Microsoft lays hands on login data: Beware of the new Outlook

Hi, ... I have not been aware of the fact that *ALL* apps actually might be doing this. It was just recently that I looked for alternative iOS mail apps - and "phoning home" credentials got noted only for the Spark app. This seems to be not restricted to iOS apps. Recently I tried "Blue Mail"

[mailop] Google Groups considered as spam by Gmail

Hi, I subscribed to some bigbluebutton related Google Groups some time ago. In the beginning of June, something must have been changed at Gmail. Every mail sent by these groups since then have been considered as spam by Gmail - those mails had only technical content as before. Did anyone els

[mailop] SDNS requests broken?

Hi, I wanted to add an IP from 116.202.0.0/16, selected "postmas...@mydomain.org" and just got nothing. Not even a connection request from Microsoft. I retried several times, now I have the max number of requests, but still no mail to allow the access. Regards Bjoern

Re: [mailop] Bitcoin Spam from Gmail

Hi, Typical gmail spam. They have been around for many years, google isn't able to stop them. I thought it would be something new, as rspamd didn't find anything suspicious Regards Bjoern ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.m

[mailop] Bitcoin Spam from Gmail

Hi, recently some users on my private server get masses of Bitcoin spam from Gmail. Subjects like "Get__your__transaction__0.7495__BTC" with attached PDFs, which contain an image with a link on the first page, and then pages of nonsense like "And what about the intruder? Arthur, you know Mad

Re: [mailop] T-Online is now really blocking messages from non-commercial and simliar senders

Am 21.10.22 um 13:27 schrieb Gellner, Oliver via mailop: On 20.10.22 20:30, Kai 'wusel' Siering via mailop wrote: Since t-online.de is the only "walled garden mail domain" known – at least AFAIK? –, any email to and especially from @t-online.de should be rejected in any default configuration o

Re: [mailop] T-Online is now really blocking messages from non-commercial and simliar senders

Hi, That hoster is Hetzner. With their equally unacceptable policies regarding abuse reports, they are at least partially creating this problem for their customers themselves. Did this issue only occur with Hetzner for now? Regards Bjoern ___ mail

Re: [mailop] Large volume of script spam related to liberachat false-flag

Hi, The dayjob just got hit with a number of scripts from a bunch of compromised VPSes with subject lines promoting LiberaChat (false-flag), telling us our network sucks, saying transphobic things, and the like. it seems a new wave is coming, from OVH and shaw.ca. Regards Bjoern ___

Re: [mailop] spamhaus blocking Linode IPv6 (2a01:7e01)

Hi, I think Linode does not follow the /64 rule and assigns thousands of customers within the 2a01:7e01::/64 block. They user a bunch of blocks, depending on their data centre. I think by default each client is assigned a single /128 IPv6 address per server. See https://www.spamhaus.org/o

Re: [mailop] Gmail putting messages to spam

Hi, $ dig +short TXT _dmarc.gmail.com "v=DMARC1; p=none; sp=quarantine; rua=mailto:mailauth-repo...@google.com"; .. but then refusing to receive them ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Google Groups for receiving DMARC reports and then refusing them because of spam or nobody external is allowed to post there is also

Re: [mailop] Gmail putting messages to spam

Hi, I want to return to an old issue, which repeatedly happens again and again, that is, Google putting emails from me to recipient's spam folder. What's absurd, this happens not only to Gmail addresses to which I am writing for the first time, but also to recipients with whom I have previously

[mailop] Malware waves from hotmail.com

Hi, since several weeks we are getting several mails a day from hotmail.com users with subjects like "fob xt k xerhc", an attached malware PDF like [1] and adressed to ~200 recipients. Mabye we should consider blocking all outbound servers of Microsoft because some part of their network is sendin

Re: [mailop] protection.outlook.com refusing to accept mail with misleading temp error message

Hi, > Glad to hear that they could help you but I'm of the stubborn kind - we're > not doing anything wrong, we're not spamming, > we're not in a spammy neighborhood (afaik). That StupidScreen® Filter or > whatever is deciding that our mail should be > temp rejected for a day is the thing that's

Re: [mailop] Info - DMARC at WEB.DE, GMX, mail.com coming soon

Hi, > > Very soon, we will go live with DMARC check on incoming mails for all > mailboxes operated by WEB.DE, GMX & mail.com . > That covers several hundred of recipient domains [1] and roughly 50% of > the German email users. maybe you should fix this: : host mx-ha02.web.de[2

Re: [mailop] DMARC Reports are Spam according to Google...

Am 16.10.20 um 09:13 schrieb Benoît Panizzon via mailop: > Come on Google, that is a joke, isn't it? > > That email was correctly signed with DKIM. The SPF entry is correct. > > Google requested that email: > > _DMARC.google.ch descriptive text "v=DMARC1; p=reject; > rua=mailto:mailauth-repo...@

Re: [mailop] [ADMIN] List migration complete

Hi, > > FYI we have, finally, completed the mailing list migration to a new VM. > > Firstly: many, many thanks to Andy Davidson for administering & hosting the > list on his own kit for all the years it's been running. First message sent > to the list was from Andy, way back in 2007! Thanks f

Re: [mailop] Deutsche Telekom rejects connections because of missing "provider identification"

Hi, the requirement for having an imprint in advertising mails is not limited to T-Online. It’s a legal requirement and also criteria for the Certified Senders Alliance (CSA) which is at least relevant in Germany. For those not having heard of it – it’s a whitelisting project originally fro

Re: [mailop] ANNOUNCEMENT: The NEW invaluement "Service Provider DNSBLs" - 1st one for Sendgrid-spams!

Am 21.08.20 um 23:33 schrieb Al Iverson via mailop: This is interesting. At first I thought Rob's intent was to just facilitate the blocking of that one ESP fully, but I see that he is trying hard here to avoid collateral damage and that's admirable. Good luck with this, Rob! Did you send this

Re: [mailop] Google and Spam detection

Hi, Recently, I heard often that my mails to friends on gmail ended up in spam. Recently I moved my domain to a VPS at Netcup and all reputation at Google seem to be broken. Last week I sent a G-Suite user a cancellation of an appointment - which was discussed before via mail - and the pe

Re: [mailop] Google: 'Low reputation of the sending domain'

Hi, There are no breaches or spam or anything sent from that server. I would know as I am part of the AS6772 Abuse Desk. :-) Just the dozed or so emails per day sent by my family members and myself. Even emails to my own Gmail Account where my sending email address for sure is a know past send

Re: [mailop] Suggestions for mailops.org website - forum?

> > Google Groups ;) > Until Google refuses again to accept your mail ;) ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Suggestions for mailops.org website - forum?

> > From past experience of technical mailing lists changing to forums, I'd > expect participation in a forum to drop dramatically. Mailing list > messages get pushed to members, forums require you to go and look. Even > if new posted messages are emailed to members, then it still requires >

Re: [mailop] Suggestions for VPS providers in Europe?

Am 03.12.19 um 00:59 schrieb John Levine via mailop: > I warned a guy away from Hetzner and OVH if he wants to send mail so he > reasonably asked what VPS provider in Europe is better for sending mail. > > Any suggestions? https://www.ultravps.eu/ - no issues with blacklists in their Amsterdam lo

Re: [mailop] No response on DNS queries to NS for zen.spamhaus.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, > > Using their (the hosters resolver) works. But I do not want to > depend on their resolver. It's bad enough that I depend on their > support, who now offered me to buy(!) another IP) As a.gns.spamhaus.org has some IPv6 addresses, is resolvin

Re: [mailop] No response on DNS queries to NS for zen.spamhaus.org

Hi, > No, it is a vServer at netcup: 46.38.236.101 > Netcup support told me, that they checked from another vServer in the > same network w/o any problem. (But I do not know *what* > and *how* they checked.) ok, from 194.59.205.151 also at netcup "dig -4 @a.gns.spamhaus.org 2.0.0.127.zen.spamha

Re: [mailop] [ext] Re: No response on DNS queries to NS for zen.spamhaus.org

Hey, > > Are they blocking the Hetzner net in it's entirety or only their recursive > resolvers? > From my last experience they block them entirely, no resolving was possible with a cloud server in Nuremberg and in Helsinki. Regards Bjoern ___ mailo

Re: [mailop] No response on DNS queries to NS for zen.spamhaus.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, > from a vServer, I recently got, I'm not able to sucessfully > receive answers from spamhaus: > is it a Cloud-Server at Hetzner? Regards Bjoern -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE50+q6/omL69GAhCq/P5hJz70fX8FAl25Yz4ACgkQ/P5hJz70 f

Re: [mailop] DANE validation

Am 11.07.19 um 21:29 schrieb Ross Tajvar via mailop: > Yes, this is exactly what I was wondering. I'm sure it's possible to > validate on any reasonably modern MTA, but I am curious if hosted mail > providers (or even large enterprises) are actually doing this validation. Posteo and United Interne