Would they? I suspect many would just need a little precision hammering (like
for elongating gold into gold leaf), some more than others.
Le 23 août 2023 13:59:08 UTC, Doug McIntyre via mailop a
écrit :
>On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 01:08:36PM +0300, Lena--- via mailop wrote:
>> > I don't know where
there's one case where SPF +all is valid. That's when you already have DKIM
anyway, and in any event, only if mail from your domain can validly come from
anywhere.
The only time this'd be an issue is if you had MUAs sending directly, which
mostly doesn't exist anymore, much to my chagrin (afaik
Likely that ULA has to send email from that host inside their network?
On 4 March 2023 19:00:18 UTC, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
>Dnia 3.03.2023 o godz. 22:21:28 John Levine via mailop pisze:
>> It appears that Jan Schaumann via mailop said:
>> >$ host -t txt h-email.net
>> >h-email.net de
I received one of these bad girls to my Nightmare Mail (fork of notqmail),
albeit with a different argument to the attempted wget command (which was never
processed, though my mailserver was able to successfully make delivery of this
technically non-compliant message). It seems to my friends to
it's also a mistake that makes a lot of sense in the historical context of the
email network - DSNs against misconfigured or unpatched email servers were
often used for backscatter spam (which was thankfully prevented here by
rejection during SMTP), so it made sense to treat them as regular mess
A Russian government agency tasked with implementing the block could run a 5xx
responder on port 25 if it had the IPs directed at it.
On 10 March 2022 21:15:43 UTC, Jay Hennigan via mailop
wrote:
>On 3/10/22 12:22, Autumn Tyr-Salvia via mailop wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Given world events at the m
Wait - Spamhaus dnsd is in C++?
On 11 November 2021 02:58:58 UTC, Michael Peddemors via mailop
wrote:
>On 2021-11-10 11:47 a.m., Rob McEwen via mailop wrote:
>> The only issue here is that, for every user/customer that needs a unique
>> key, an entirely different set of data has to be loaded in
Hey Jaroslaw, may I message you off-list and from a third email address with a
permissive ingress policy? I noticed something that might be salient in your
email headers.
On 4 October 2021 21:33:16 UTC, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
>Dnia 4.10.2021 o godz. 14:17:33 Michael Peddemors via mai
you know, Mr Allard, it appears that you sent this message to the list at least
5 times...
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:54:57 +0200
Renaud Allard via mailop wrote:
>
>
> On 8/5/20 2:47 PM, Otto J. Makela via mailop wrote:
> > On 21/05/2019 12.37, Otto J. Makela via mailop wrote:
> >> Is there any poin
Please change your font to a monospaced font to view this message optimally.
I'll admit, I think it took me a bit to comprehend offline mode, back when I was
like 6 or 7.
I feel like having a box like this one I've just drawn you pop up every time you
enqueue a message to send while under offline
The 1st NDR (we will be trying for the next N days) can come in around half an
hour of no delivery. Electronic mail has a delay even when it's working
properly. That's why it's not called instant messaging. I generally expect
around a 5 to 10 minute delay on messages. I have the naïve user mindset
I'm actually 19 so I largely use it for nostalgia's sake. Yes. I'm 19
and I'm a private email operator. And I've used UUCP. Part of it is to
get around SMTP blocks, part of it is to, as I said, entertain
nostalgia. I don't really know. I guess I am fond of bangpaths.
On 19-12-07 20 h 34, Philip P
Well I am using it over the internet. And it's strictly for nostalgia's
sake, as well as future expansion to utilitarian uses where email has to
be sent from a host on a dynamic IP.
On 19-12-06 10 h 08, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote:
On 6 Dec 2019, at 9:17, John Levine via mailop wrote:
I'd
n setup if documentation is clear and concise.
On 19-12-05 15 h 53, Brielle via mailop wrote:
I use Exim, and have been for a lng time. The multi-file config
package in Debian is quite nice and makes it easy to configure and
customize.
On 12/5/2019 4:36 PM, Large Hadron Collider via mailop wrote:
T
package in Debian is quite nice and makes it easy to configure and
customize.
On 12/5/2019 4:36 PM, Large Hadron Collider via mailop wrote:
> The subject says it all.
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chil
The subject says it all.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
16 matches
Mail list logo
