Re: [mailop] Storing 821 envelope recipients in an 822.Header?

2016-12-07 Thread Gilles Chehade via mailop
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:00:28AM +1000, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > David Hofstee wrote: > > The X- type headers are deprecated... https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648 > > > Oh now there's a bad idea if ever I heard one... > > :/ > wow, missed that one

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

2016-09-21 Thread Gilles Chehade via mailop
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:54:43PM +, Michael Wise wrote: > > If it's Hotmail, it's almost certainly an IP specific issue. Open a ticket > ok thanks ! > ________ > From: Gilles Chehade<mailto:gil...@poolp.org> > Sent: ?9/?2

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

2016-09-21 Thread Gilles Chehade via mailop
g about the reputation (or lack thereof) > of your smarthost from Microsoft's perspective, something content-related, > or just MS being inscrutable. > > ... uh, given you're doing MTA development, you don't have test autoresponders > or anything else tha

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

2016-09-21 Thread Gilles Chehade via mailop
:56 AM > To: mailop<mailto:mailop@mailop.org> > Subject: Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ? > > > > On Sep 21, 2016, at 4:02 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > > > > I'm wondering if there is something wrong in the format of our headers > >

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

2016-09-21 Thread Gilles Chehade via mailop
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:49:48AM -0700, Steve Atkins wrote: > > > On Sep 21, 2016, at 4:02 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > > > > I'm wondering if there is something wrong in the format of our headers > > and if this could affect users of our software d

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

2016-09-21 Thread Gilles Chehade via mailop
> From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Gilles Chehade > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 6:02 AM > To: mailop@mailop.org > Subject: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ? > > Hi, > > I'm lead developer of an opensource MTA called OpenSM

[mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

2016-09-21 Thread Gilles Chehade
7;m wondering if there is something wrong in the format of our headers and if this could affect users of our software disregarding the kind of mails they send with it. I've been tackling this for hours before contacting the mailing list. Any help would be greatly appreciated, I'm running ou

Re: [mailop] Mail accepted by outlook.com/hotmail.com disappears.

2016-03-23 Thread Gilles Chehade
eing made > about it. > very very cool, this mail dropping thing is absurd and pretty much any other option as harsh as it can be is going to be a better response :) let us know if you need a megaphone to amplify your noise ! -- Gilles Chehade https:

Re: [mailop] Spike in "554 Transaction failed" from Microsoft properties

2016-02-05 Thread Gilles Chehade
Hi, FWIW, I observed the same today while exhanging quite low volumes Gilles Le 6 févr. 2016 12:27 AM, Frank Bulk a écrit : > > Today we had an abnormal number of messages that failed to deliver to > Microsoft properties due to "554 Transaction failed". > > We had 31 today, but only 6 over the

Re: [mailop] Blog: Logjam, Openssl and Email Deliverability

2015-06-25 Thread Gilles Chehade
lose the message. If it starts failing sessions that it could succeed just so that other hosts realize that they need a fix in their setup, this feels like the beginning of an already lost battle :-p -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg